BRIDGEPORT, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: AS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC in 640 NORTH WASHINGTON AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344480991.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 640 NORTH WASHINGTON AVENUE
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06604
- Mailing
- 4 COZY HOLLOW ROAD, DANBURY, CT 06811
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- May 12, 2020
- Abate by
- May 26, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $325 · Current $325
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 640 North Washington Avenue, Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604 Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1b with a final order date of April 9, 2020 was not received within 10 calendar days (by April 18, 2020) following the abatement due date ( April 8, 2020).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $325
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Mar 13, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift. Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e). JOBSITE: Employees were installing metal panels to the exterior of a building from the basket of the Sunbelt telescopic aerial lift approximately 17 feet above the ground without wearing personal fall arrest systems or other equivalent protective means.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Mar 13, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 8, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. JOBSITE: The employer did not ensure that the employees installing metal panels to the exterior of a building from the basket of the Sunbelt telescopic aerial lift were provided with training and information to minimize hazards while working from the aerial lift.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344480991.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.