Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SIMCO COATINGS, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SIMCO COATINGS, INC. in 211 GUNTHER LN., BELLE CHASSE, LA 70037 (NAICS 325510). OSHA activity number 344484423.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Simco Coatings, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Simco Coatings, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
211 GUNTHER LN.
City
BELLE CHASSE
State
LA
ZIP
70037
Mailing
211 GUNTHER LN., BELLE CHASSE, LA 70037
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325510
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2020
Abate by
Apr 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $1,619 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause serious physical harm to employees, in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards:  a) On or about December 3, 2019, in the Warehouse, employee did not wear the required seat belt while operating a TCM FG20 forklift truck.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1619.2
  • · Z (S) $4048

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2020
Abate by
Apr 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,470 · Current $1,388 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) On or about December 3, 2019, in the Warehouse, an employee was required to wear a tight-fighting particulate respirator for mixing paint without the implementation of a Respiratory Protection Program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1388
  • · Z (S) $3470

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2020
Abate by
Apr 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) On or about December 3, 2019, in the Warehouse, employees were required to wear tight-fitting particulate respirators for mixing paint, without first being medically evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2020
Abate by
Apr 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) On or about December 3, 2019, in the Warehouse, an employee was required to wear a tight-fighting particulate respirator for mixing paint without first being fit-tested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2020
Abate by
Apr 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  a) On or about December 3, 2019, in the Warehouse, an employee who had facial hair was required to wear a tight-fighting particulate respirator for mixing paint.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 L03 III D

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2020
Abate by
Apr 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,735 · Current $694 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(3)(iii)(d): Pendant control stations were not kept clean, and/or their function labels were not kept legible:  a) On or about December 3, 2019, in the Warehouse, employees used an unlabeled gantry crane pendant control to move drums.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $694
  • · Z (S) $1735

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2020
Abate by
Apr 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $1,619 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) On or about December 3, 2019, in the Warehouse, an employee used chemicals such as but not limited to Epoxy Primer (flammable, irritant), Methyl ethyl ketone (flammable, toxicant), and Xylene (flammable, toxicant) to mix paint without an established Hazard Communication Program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1619.2
  • · Z (S) $4048

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 18, 2020
Abate by
Apr 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) On or about December 3, 2019, in the Warehouse, employees used chemicals such as but not limited to Epoxy Primer (flammable, irritant), Methyl ethyl ketone (flammable, toxicant), and Xylene (flammable, toxicant) to mix paint without being provided effective information and training.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Simco Coatings, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344484423.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.