Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: NEWTEK AUTOMOTIVE USA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NEWTEK AUTOMOTIVE USA in 6200 ST. JOHN AVE 15E, KANSAS CITY, MO 64123 (NAICS 423120). OSHA activity number 344491279.

Watch Newtek Automotive USA — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Newtek Automotive USA is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6200 ST. JOHN AVE 15E
City
KANSAS CITY
State
MO
ZIP
64123
Mailing
P.O. BOX 6609, KANSAS CITY, MO 64123
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423120
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5398.00 · Current $2969.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:  Employees were exposed to egress hazards.  The exit door to the left of the cardboard baler/compactor was blocked by a pallet of cardboard on the interior side.  The same exit door was blocked on the other side on the Incoming/Outgoing staging area for freight.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2968.9
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.176 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5398.00 · Current $2969.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(a): Where mechanical handling equipment was used, sufficient safe clearances were not allowed for aisles, at loading docks, through doorways or wherever turns or passage had to be made:    Employees were exposed to struck by hazards.  Row 26-27 did not have sufficient safe clearance for the forklift.  There were pallets on the floor in the aisle not allowing sufficient clearance for the forklift and pickers to maneuver.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2968.9
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5398.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse:    (a) Employees were exposed to struck by pallets and falling materials hazards The racking was damaged near the bottom section in Row 22 between 9 and 10 section between 22090202 and 22100101 section 1, the bottom section.      (a) Employees were exposed to struck by hazards. The racking was damaged on Row 22 at the bottom level 22010102 and 22020101.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5398.00 · Current $2969.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  Employees were exposed to struck by hazards. Employees were not given a combination of formal instruction, practical training and evaluation to operate the forklift and pickers.  Employees were given mainly hands on training.  One employee who operated a picker was not certified to operate the picker.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2968.9
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:    Employees were exposed to struck by hazards.  Records were not being kept for forklift training.  Certification did not included the name of the operator, date of the training, date of the evaluation, and identity of the person performing the training or evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5398.00 · Current $2969.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  (a)  Employees were exposed to struck by hazards and obstructed view hazards. The Crown lift Order Picker #3 had a cracked windshield and was not taken out of service until restored to a safe operating condition in the warehouse.  The glass could shatter and strike the employee if products fell and struck the already damaged glass.  (b) Employees were exposed to struck by hazards. The Crown Forklift #11 the back light was not working and it was not taken out of service until restored to a safe operating condition in the warehouse.  (c) Employees were exposed to struck by hazards. The Toyota propane forklift had one front light that wasn't working in the Packing and Shipping Area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2968.9
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.303 G01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5398.00 · Current $2969.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:  Employees were exposed to electrical hazards.  The electrical panel for the heat shrinker was blocked by cardboard, a cart, a fan and a wooden pallet in the Packing Area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2968.9
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5398.00 · Current $2969.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Employees are exposed to chemical hazards from utilizing propane and other chemicals.  There was no written hazard communication program to explain how chemicals would be labelled, how safety data sheets would be maintained, and training given.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2968.9
  • — Z (S) $5398

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344491279.