STAMFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: RBD STAMFORD, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RBD STAMFORD, LLC in 700 EAST MAIN STREET, STAMFORD, CT 06901 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 344499207.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RBD STAMFORD, LLC
- Site address
- 700 EAST MAIN STREET
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06901
- Mailing
- 700 EAST MAIN STREET, STAMFORD, CT 06901
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 145
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2020
- Abate by
- May 8, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $10,603 · Current $7,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: WORKSHOP/LAUNDRY ROOM: The employer had not established and implemented written step-by-step energy control procedures in the machine specific for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the linen ironer.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $7400
- · Z (S) $10603
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program were understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls were acquired by employees, including (c)(7)(1)(A) and (c)(7)(1)(B) of this section: WORKSHOP/LAUNDRY ROOM: The employees, as authorized, affected and/or other types were not provided with training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of revised energy sources (lo/to) during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the linen ironer.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.304 F01 IV
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $8,482 · Current $5,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(iv): Overcurrent devices for circuits rated 600 volts, nominal, or less, were not readily accessible to each employee or authorized building management personnel: WORKSHOP/LAUNDRY ROOM: The two (2) wall mounted electrical panels were blocked by a 55-gallon plastic container and an empty box.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $5900
- · Z (S) $8482
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2020
- Abate by
- May 19, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $424 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employers did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training would be met, and which also including (e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii) of this section: WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented a site specific written hazard communication program, including the Globalized Harmonized System (GHS) where employees were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) the stain blaster, pathway drain treatment, glasspro clean, 66 Heavy Duty bath cleaner & disinfectant, Zephair Mountain Mist Air Fresher, Gel pro, Lemon-EZE, Revitalize Miracle Spotter, Digi clean anti bacterial soap, CBS plus, Care strip, Low temp laundry solid chlorine sanitize, and aquanomic 2.0 low temp laundry solid detergent. Sheraton Hotel Hartford South was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200( e) (1), which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1104184, Citation Number 1, Item Number 2, issued on 04-01-2016, and became a final order on 04-25-2016, with respect to a workplace location at 100 Capital Boulevard, Rocky Hill, CT 06067. Northbrook Hotel Group LP, dba Sheraton Chicago Northbrook was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200( e)(1), which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1365404, Citation Number 1, Item Number 1, issued on 02-27-2019, and became a final order on 03-25-2019, with respect to a workplace location at 1110 Willow Road, Northbrook, IL 60062.
Recent events (3)
- · P (R) $400
- · I (R) $400
- · Z (R) $424
1904.33 A
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.33(a): 29 CFR 1904.33(a): The employer did not maintain the OSHA 300 log, the privacy case list, the annual summary and the OSHA 301 Incident Report forms for five (5) years following the end of the calendar year that those records covered. ESTABLISHMENT: The employer had not maintained the Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300-A) for the years of 2015 through 2019.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $3300
- · Z (O) $5000
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2020
- Abate by
- May 19, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: WORKSHOP: The employer had not verified through a written certification that the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (3)
- · P (O) $0
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1030 C02 II
- Issued
- Feb 20, 2020
- Abate by
- May 8, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(ii): The Exposure Control Plan shall be reviewed and updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure. WORKSHOP: The employer did not review and/or update the bloodborne pathogen Exposure Control Plan at least annually.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344499207.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.