Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: BERRY GLOBAL, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BERRY GLOBAL, INC. in 202 SOUTH JOHN STOCKBAUER DRIVE, VICTORIA, TX 77904 (NAICS 326111). OSHA activity number 344499868.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Berry Global, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Berry Global, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BERRY GLOBAL, INC.
Site address
202 SOUTH JOHN STOCKBAUER DRIVE
City
VICTORIA
State
TX
ZIP
77904
Mailing
202 SOUTH JOHN STOCKBAUER DRIVE, VICTORIA, TX 77904
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326111
Employees
170
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 K01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2020
Abate by
Apr 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,193 · Current $4,097 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k):   On or about January 30th, 2020, at this establishment, where employees operated and manufactured different lines of the plastic film and bags products, were exposed to noise hazards without an initial effective hearing conservation training program in place:  The Plastic Box Machine #16 Operator/Packer was exposed to a noise level of 93.20 dBA during a 418 minutes sampling period.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $4096.5
  • · C (S) $8193
  • · Z (S) $8193

1910.95 K02

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2020
Abate by
Apr 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(2): The training program was not repeated annually for each employee included in the hearing conservation program:   On or about January 30th, 2020, at this establishment, where employees operated and manufactured different lines of the plastic film and bags products, were exposed to noise hazards without a continuing and effective annually hearing conservation training program in place:  a. The Plastic Extrusions Line #19 Operator was exposed to a noise level of 88.10 dBA during a 436 minutes sampling period; b. The Plastic Bags Automation Machine Technician was exposed to a noise level of 89.20 dBA during a 432 minutes sampling period; c. The Plastic Box Machine #19 Operator/Packer was exposed to a noise level of 88.90 dBA during a 423 minutes sampling period; and, d. The Plastic Box Machine #16 Operator/Packer was exposed to a noise level of 93.20 dBA during a 418 minutes sampling period.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.95 L01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2020
Abate by
Apr 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(l)(1): The employer did not make available to affected employees or their representatives copies of 29 CFR 1910.95 and did not post a copy in the workplace:   On or about January 30th, 2020, at this establishment, where employees were exposed to noise hazard, the employer did not make available to all affected employees copies of 29 CFR 1910.95 and did not post a copy in the workplace:  a. The Plastic Extrusions Line #19 Operator was exposed to a noise level of 88.10 dBA during a 436 minutes sampling period; b. The Plastic Bags Automation Machine Technician was exposed to a noise level of 89.20 dBA during a 432 minutes sampling period; c. The Plastic Box Machine #19 Operator/Packer was exposed to a noise level of 88.90 dBA during a 423 minutes sampling period; and, d. The Plastic Box Machine #16 Operator/Packer was exposed to a noise level of 93.20 dBA during a 418 minutes sampling period.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 7 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2020
Abate by
Apr 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $6,747 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed:   At this establishment, employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in or -between, amputation and electrical hazards when performing repairs, service and/or maintenance of energized machinery and equipment. Inspections of the energy control procedures were not conducted at least annually for all machines and equipment such as, but not limited to:  a. Case Palletizing Robot Machine, 11-E-6; b. Plastic Bags Automation Robot, Fanuc M710 iG; c. Plastic Film Extruder Line Machine #11 to #19, Kiefel CA6; d. Plastic Bags Automation Machine, Genesis #2372; e. Plastic Box Machine #16 and #19, ADCO 15DZ-60-SS; f. Drawstring Plastic Line Bag Machine, CMD 1270GDS; and, g. Drawstring Plastic Line Winding Machine, CMD 4213RO.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $6747
  • · C (S) $13494
  • · Z (S) $13494

1910.147 D03

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):   At this establishment, employees were exposed to struck-by, caught-in or -between, amputation and electrical hazards when performing repairs, service and/or maintenance of energized machinery and equipment. The employer did not ensure that employees lockout/tagout, shut down, isolated, blocked and secured energized machines or equipment:  a. Plastic Film Extruder Line Machine #11, Kiefel CA6 (480 Volts); b. Plastic Film Extruder Line Machine #12, Kiefel CA6 (480 Volts); c. Plastic Film Extruder Line Machine #13, Kiefel CA6 (480 Volts); and, d. Plastic Film Extruder Line Machine #15, Kiefel CA6 (480 Volts);
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.133 A03

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2020
Abate by
Apr 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee, who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards, used protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection over the prescription glasses or protective lenses with side shields:   At this establishment, the employer did not ensure that each affected employee, who wore prescription lenses, used eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Berry Global, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344499868.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.