Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AUTOMATED MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AUTOMATED MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS, INC. in 19706 PROGRESS DR., STRONGSVILLE, OH 44149 (NAICS 333319). OSHA activity number 344503834.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Automated Manufacturing Solutions, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Automated Manufacturing Solutions, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
19706 PROGRESS DR.
City
STRONGSVILLE
State
OH
ZIP
44149
Mailing
19706 PROGRESS DR., STRONGSVILLE, OH 44149
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333319
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 6, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,398 · Current $3,780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(c): Personal protective equipment was not of safe design and construction for the work to be performed:    On or about December 3, 2019 the employer failed to ensure that clothing worn in the workplace was of safe design and construction. Employees tasked with operating a powered horizontal drill press were wearing loose fitting clothing allowing the clothing to be caught in the drill press work and chuck areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3780
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 6, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE);  On or about December 3, 2019 the employer failed to assess the workplace to determine hazards which were present or likely to be present which would require the use of personal protective equipment or clothing which was of a safe design for use in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,398 · Current $3,780 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    On or about December 11, 2019 the employer failed to establish and implement a program for the control of hazardous energies when employees were tasked with servicing and maintaining equipment at the worksite. Equipment includes but is not limited to metal cutting tables and presses. Hazardous energies present on equipment includes but is not limited to electrical, mechanical, thermal, gravitational, and hydraulic.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3780
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 6, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,856 · Current $2,698 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):      On or about December 11, 2019 the employer failed to ensure that employees tasked with operating powered industrial fork trucks within the facility had received training prior to the operation of them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2698
  • — Z (S) $3856

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,856 · Current $2,698 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): Frequent inspections of the cranes were not performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(a) of this section or as specifically indicated:      On or about December 11, 2019 the employer failed to ensure that the 3 overhead cranes available and utilized by employees in the facility had received frequent inspections as required. The employer had not performed monthly crane inspections.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2698
  • — Z (S) $3856

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete inspections of the cranes were not performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section, depending upon its activity, severity of service, and environment, or as specifically indicated below. These inspections did not include the requirements of paragraph (j)(2) of this section and in addition, the following items. Any deficiencies such as listed shall be carefully examined and determination made as to whether they constitute a safety hazard:      On or about December 11, 2019 the employer failed to ensure that annual inspections of the 3 overhead cranes in use in the facility had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,856 · Current $2,699 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) On or about December 11, 2019 the employer failed to ensure that effective machine guarding was in place on the Fryer CNC machine model number MC60. The door was not interlocked and could be opened by employees during operation.      b) On or about December 11, 2019 the employer failed to ensure that effective machine guarding was in place on the Cleveland vertical mill CNC machine model number M400. The door was not interlocked and could be opened by employees during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2699
  • — Z (S) $3856

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $771 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent.    On or about December 11, 2019 the employer failed to ensure that work related injuries which occurred at the facility were properly documented using OSHA 300, 301, and 300A forms or their equivalent. A workplace injury occurred on December 3, 2019. The employer had not recorded the injury or maintained injury logs for previous calendar years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $771

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     On or about December 11, 2019 the employer did not have written a hazard communication program and employees were exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to; sulfuric acid, oils, lubricants, solvents, and cleaners.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:     On or about December 11, 2019 the employer did not provide employees with information and training on hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to;  oils, lubricants, and solvents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Automated Manufacturing Solutions, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344503834.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.