Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS MASONRY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS MASONRY in 1775 BENTON, POOLER, GA 31322 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344509039.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Masonry — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Masonry is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS MASONRY
Site address
1775 BENTON
City
POOLER
State
GA
ZIP
31322
Mailing
4231 BECK PARK LANE, WINSTON SALEM, NC 27106
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2019
Abate by
Feb 5, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.  a) At the site, on or about December 11, 2019, the employer did not ensure the scaffolding system used by employees to perform masonry work was placed on a firm foundation, thereby exposing employees to fall and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2019
Abate by
Feb 5, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used.   a) At the site, on or about December 11, 2019, the employer did not provide a safe means of access to the working platforms of a tubular welded scaffolding system used by employees to perform masonry work, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2019
Abate by
Feb 5, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.   a) At the site, on or about November 11, 2019, the employer did not ensure a tubular welded scaffolding system, used by employees to perform masonry work, was equipped with mid-rails, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2019
Abate by
Feb 5, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity.  a) At the site, on or about November 11, 2019, the employer did not perform daily inspections of the a scaffolding system used by employees to perform masonry work, thereby exposing employees to fall and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2019
Abate by
Feb 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement.  a) At the site, on or about December 11, 2019, the employer did not ensure reinforcing steel was capped to protect employees from impalement hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2019
Abate by
Feb 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program:  a) At the site, on or about December 11, 2019, the employer did not develop or maintain a written hazard communication program for employees working with concrete and mortar.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 31, 2019
Abate by
Feb 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area.   a) At the site, on or about December 11, 2019, the employer did not provide training on the chemicals used by employees performing masonry work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344509039.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.