Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MOUNTAIN LAKE SERVICES FOUNDATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MOUNTAIN LAKE SERVICES FOUNDATION in 49 INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD, KEESEVILLE, NY 12911 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 344511316.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mountain Lake Services Foundation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mountain Lake Services Foundation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
49 INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD
City
KEESEVILLE
State
NY
ZIP
12911
Mailing
10 ST. PATRICKS PLACE, PORT HENRY, NY 12974
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321920
Employees
661
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $6,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  a) Duo Matic Machine - On or about October 8, 2019, an employee was exposed to caught-in hazards when clearing a nail jam due to not utilizing procedures for the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147) that consisted of multiple energy sources of electric, pneumatic, and hydraulic.  b) Duo Matic Machine - On or about December 11, 2019, an employee was exposed to caught-in hazards when clearing a nail jam due to not utilizing procedures for the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147) that consisted of multiple energy sources of electric, pneumatic, and hydraulic.  c) Duo Matic Machine - On or prior to December 13, 2019, employees were exposed to caught-in hazards when performing setup due to not utilizing procedures for the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147) that consisted of multiple energy sources of electric, pneumatic, and hydraulic.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $6750
  • — C (S) $13494
  • — Z (S) $13494

1910.147 F03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(i): A procedure was not utilized to afford the employees a level of protection equivalent to that provided by the implementation of a personal lockout or tagout device when servicing and/or maintenance was performed by a crew, craft, department or other group:  a) Duo Matic Machine - On or prior to December 13, 2019, employees were exposed to caught-in hazards when performing setup due to not utilizing group LOTO procedures for the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147) that consisted of multiple energy sources of electric, pneumatic, and hydraulic.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  a) Duo Matic Machine - On or prior to December 13, 2019, the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure for performing servicing and/or maintenance work on the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $13494
  • — Z (S) $13494

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:  a) Duo Matic Machine - On or prior to December 13, 2019, employees performed service and maintenance activities on the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147).  The company did not provide adequate training for authorized employees.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $13494
  • — Z (S) $13494

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:  a) Duo Matic Machine - On or prior to December 13, 2019, employees operate the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147).  The company did not provide adequate training for affected employees.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(C): Employees whose work operations were in an area where energy control procedures were utilized were not instructed about the procedure:  a) Facility - On or prior to December 13, 2019, employees perform service and maintenance work on machines such as, but not limited to, the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147).  The company did not provide training for other employees who may be required to walk through or work in the manufacturing area of the facility.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $9,639 · Current $4,230 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a) Duo Matic Machine - On or prior to December 13, 2019, a guard was missing/not installed on the non-operator side of the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147) potentially exposing employees to caught-in hazards.  b) Duo Matic Machine - On or about October 8, 2019, a guard was missing/not installed on the operator side of the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147) exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4230
  • — C (S) $9639
  • — Z (S) $9639

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven (7) feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:  a) Right Angle area of the Duo Matic Machine - On or about December 13, 2019, guards were not installed on sprocket wheels and chains on the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147) potentially exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 16, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  a) Duo Matic Machine - On or about December 13, 2019, an electrical box (labeled with the wording 'TYPE') on the Duo Matic Machine (The Duo Matic Assembly System is manufactured by Viking Engineering and Development, Patent #3,945,549.  The machine label also includes 950-30-1147) was missing a knockout.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Mountain Lake Services Foundation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344511316.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.