VERNON, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: RIDEL HOME IMPROVEMENT
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RIDEL HOME IMPROVEMENT in 740 ROUTE 30, VERNON, CT 06066 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344514278.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RIDEL HOME IMPROVEMENT
- Site address
- 740 ROUTE 30
- City
- VERNON
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06066
- Mailing
- 22 FOLEY STREET, MANCHESTER, CT 06040
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- May 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $1,446 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: A. On or about 12/15/2019, 740 Route 30, Vernon, CT job site South side: Employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards. Employees used an aluminum extension ladder, approximately 4 feet away from energized power lines.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1446
- · Z (S) $2892
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $1,446 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: A. On or about 12/16/19, 740 Route 30, Vernon, CT job site: Employees engaged in residential roofing activities on a steep roof, 8 in 12 pitch, employees were exposed to falls of approximately 8 feet to the ground below. Employees were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1446
- · Z (S) $2892
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $1,157 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: A. On or about 12/16/19, 740 Route 30, Vernon, CT job site: 1. West side of house: Employees used an aluminum extension ladder, that was not fully extended, to access the roof. The ladder side rails were not extended at least 3 feet above the roof landing surface. 2. Back of house: Employees used an articulating Little Giant ladder to access the roof. The ladder was approximately one foot below the roof surface.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1156.5
- · Z (S) $2313
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- May 7, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways: A. On or about 12/16/19, 740 Route 30, Vernon, CT job site: Three (3) employees used an aluminum extension ladder and an articulating ladder that did not reach roof landing surface plus three (3) feet past roof landing surface. The employer had not provided employees with training on the safe use of ladders employees were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344514278.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.