Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARIO ENCALADA VASQUEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARIO ENCALADA VASQUEZ in 7951 PINNACLE POINT DRIVE, WEST CHESTER, OH 45069 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 344520143.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mario Encalada Vasquez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mario Encalada Vasquez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7951 PINNACLE POINT DRIVE
City
WEST CHESTER
State
OH
ZIP
45069
Mailing
2743 W ALEX BELL RD., DAYTON, OH 45459
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2020
Abate by
Mar 16, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,453 · Current $4,453
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  a.) On or about December 17, 2019, an employee was not trained to recognize fall hazards such as, but not limited to, an 11.2 foot fall hazard while performing roofing work on a pitched roof, nor was he trained on when to utilize a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4453

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,453 · Current $4,453
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  a.) On December 17, 2019, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while using an extension ladder to climb onto the unprotected edge of the roof surface without extending the side rails of the ladder at least 36 inches above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4453

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,906 · Current $8,906
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a.)  On or about December 17, 2019, an employee was exposed to an 11.2 foot fall hazard while installing roof trim on an 8/12 pitched residential roof while not properly utilizing a fall protection system.  Mario Encalada Vasquez was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1296700, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 05/25/2018, with respect to a workplace located at 10051 Arnold Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45215.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $8906

View Mario Encalada Vasquez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344520143.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.