Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: M & A RAMIREZ MASONRY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of M & A RAMIREZ MASONRY, INC. in 4743 RED BANDIT, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78223 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344530134.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M & a Ramirez Masonry, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M & a Ramirez Masonry, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4743 RED BANDIT
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78223
Mailing
3122 SAN FERNANDO STREET, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78207
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
9
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,735 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights is no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary (for example, to fit around uprights when side brackets are used to extend the width of the platform):    On or about December 26, 2019, employees were exposed to a fall hazard to the ground level below while performing masonry activities without the scaffold platform being fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $700
  • · Z (S) $1735

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,735 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms are more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used:    On or about December 26, 2019, employees were exposed to a fall hazard to the ground level below while accessing the scaffold platform without a ladder attached.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $700
  • · Z (S) $1735

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2020
Abate by
Mar 6, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,735 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:    On or about December 26, 2019, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while working from a fabricated frame scaffold without being trained on fall hazard recognition.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $700
  • · Z (S) $1735

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,735 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):       On or about December 26, 2019, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet to the ground level below while installing masonry bricks from the front porch patio without having a fall protection system in place.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $700
  • · Z (S) $1735

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2020
Abate by
Mar 6, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,735 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:    On or about December 26, 2019, employees were exposed to a respiratory hazard while mixing Portland Cement Type S, which contains silica, without performing an employee exposure assessment to respirable silica.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $700
  • · Z (S) $1735

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344530134.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.