NEW BRITAIN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: THE GUIDA-SEIBERT DAIRY COMPANY
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of THE GUIDA-SEIBERT DAIRY COMPANY in 433 PARK STREET, NEW BRITAIN, CT 06051 (NAICS 311511). OSHA activity number 344541081.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE GUIDA-SEIBERT DAIRY COMPANY
- Site address
- 433 PARK STREET
- City
- NEW BRITAIN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06051
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 2110, NEW BRITAIN, CT 06050
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311511
- Employees
- 225
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $3,318 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: Maintenance Shop: On, or about, January 7, 2020, the work rest on the Dayton bench grinder was adjusted one quarter of an inch from the abrasive wheel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3318
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: Maintenance Shop: On, or about, January 7, 2020, the tongue guard provided on the Dayton bench grinder was adjusted one half of an inch from the abrasive wheel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 F03
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,424 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven (7) feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed: Filling Room: On, or about, January 7, 2020, chain and sprocket drives were not provided with guarding where in-running nip points were exposed: A. N9-B Caser, Drive 7. B. Q11 Filler, Caser B. C. Gallon B, Take-up P-02.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $4424
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2020
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $6,506 · Current $6,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: Company: On, or about, January 7, 2020, maintenance personnel had not been trained regarding what work practices and protective equipment was required to protect them against electric shock, arc flash and arc blast hazards while performing live trouble-shooting and verifying whether or not electrical equipment was properly de-energized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $6506
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with and did not use electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: Company: On, or about, January 7, 2020, personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, voltage rated gloves, face shields, hard hats and hearing protection were not worn by employees who performed live electrical work, including trouble-shooting, or who verified that electrical equipment was properly de-energized. Also, non-arc rated hair nets were worn by employees who performed electrical work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 II
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 28, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(ii): Protective equipment was not maintained in a safe, reliable condition and/or was not periodically inspected or tested: Company: On, or about, January 7, 2020, a pair of Salisbury Class 00 gloves was provided for use by employees. The last test date on the gloves was December, 2008.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at The Guida-Seibert Dairy Company
View The Guida-Seibert Dairy Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311511)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344541081.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.