Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: BOULDER DEVELOPERS, INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of BOULDER DEVELOPERS, INC. in 18161-18165 94TH AVE., TINLEY PARK, IL 60487 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344545991.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Boulder Developers, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Boulder Developers, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
18161-18165 94TH AVE.
City
TINLEY PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60487
Mailing
14047 S. HARRISON AVE., POSEN, IL 60469
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
Mar 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $1,735 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a. On or about January 8, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee using a pneumatic nail gun did not wear safety glasses, thereby exposing the employee to the hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1735
  • · Z (S) $2892

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
Mar 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $2,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a.  On or about January 8, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential carpentry operations and roofing operations on a townhouse, twelve (12) feet eight (8) inches and twenty (20) feet seven (7) inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.  b.  On or about January 8, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee performing residential carpentry operations on a townhouse, nine (9) feet seven (7) inches for the basement access, and nine (9) feet (2) inches above the floor for the balcony, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2428
  • · Z (S) $4048

1926.502 D06 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
Mar 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(ii): A snaphook not of the locking type was engaged (i) directly to webbing, rope or wire rope; (ii) to each other (iii) to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached;(iv) to a horizontal lifeline; or (v) to any objectwhich is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snaphook such that unintentional disengagement could occur by the connected object being able to depress the snaphook keeper and release itself.  a.  On or about January 8, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee conducting carpentry operations on a roof was improperly tied off by wrapping his lanyard around a roof truss and attaching the snaphook to the lanyard strap, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards of approximately twelve (12) feet eight (8) inches.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
Mar 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee:  a.  On or about January 8, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee conducting carpentry sheeting operations on a roof was improperly tied off in that, the anchorage point for the personal fall arrest system (PFAS) was not capable of supporting at least 5000 pounds. The lanyard was wrapped around a roof truss that was not completely tied into the building, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards of approximately twelve (12) feet eight (8) inches.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
May 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $1,735 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    a.  On or about January 8, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, the employee conducting carpentry sheeting operations was not provided training on how to minimize fall hazards, thereby exposing employee to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1735
  • · Z (S) $2892

1926.1052 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
Apr 16, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $1,735 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail:  a.  On or about January 8, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, the stairway to the second floor was not provided with handrails, thereby exposing an employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1735
  • · Z (S) $2892

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
Mar 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $1,735 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:   a. On or about January 8, 2020 at the above addressed jobsite, the portable ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least three (3') feet above the upper landing surface, thereby exposing the employee to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1735
  • · Z (S) $2892

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
May 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.    a.  On or about January 8, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was not provided training that would enable the employee to recognize hazards related to ladders, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
May 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.    a. On or about January 8, 2020, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall protection training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification of record.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344545991.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.