Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: BEMIS WISCONSIN LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BEMIS WISCONSIN LLC in 2450 BADGER AVE., OSHKOSH, WI 54903 (NAICS 326112). OSHA activity number 344573571.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bemis Wisconsin LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bemis Wisconsin LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BEMIS WISCONSIN LLC
Site address
2450 BADGER AVE.
City
OSHKOSH
State
WI
ZIP
54903
Mailing
2450 BADGER AVE., OSHKOSH, WI 54903
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326112
Employees
500
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2020
Abate by
Jun 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section:  a) On or about December 4, 2019 energy control procedures and/or equivalent protection was not required to be utilized by employees when cleaning activities such as but not limited to, scraping build-up from rotating rollers and/or idlers on the Rigid Coater 11.     b) Energy control procedures and/or equivalent protections was not required to be utilized by employees when performing setup activities, such as but not limited to, threading the melt curtain through rollers and the lam drum, and/or adjusting the bolts on the melt curtain die, while the web was moving through the coater line.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $13494
  • · Z (S) $13494

1910.147 D

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2020
Abate by
May 26, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d): Application of control. The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) shall cover the following elements and actions and shall be done in the following sequence:    On or about December 4, 2019, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts when they engaged in cleaning activities such as but not limited to scraping rollers and idler rollers activities on the Rigid Coater 11. The employer did not ensure that employees implemented energy control application steps prior to allowing them to clean. The machine was not deenergized prior to the employee engaging in the servicing / maintenance activity.     As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [1910.147(d)(3)], lockout/tagout device application [1910.147(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [1910(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [1910.147(d)(6)] were not implemented to protect employees from machine hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 8 instances 8 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2020
Abate by
May 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $13,494
1910.212(a)(3)(ii) : The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.   The employer did not ensure that a rotating idler roller on Coater 11 was adequately guarded to protect employees when manually removing residue from the surface of the idler roller during production of coated sheets.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $13494
  • · C (S) $13494
  • · Z (S) $13494

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344573571.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.