Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MAYES & SONS PLUMBING CO.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MAYES & SONS PLUMBING CO. in 13611 ELLWOOD AVE., CLEVELAND, OH 44135 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 344599261.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mayes & Sons Plumbing CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mayes & Sons Plumbing CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
13611 ELLWOOD AVE.
City
CLEVELAND
State
OH
ZIP
44135
Mailing
11434 ROLLINGS MEADOWS DR., GARRETTSVILLE, OH 44231
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
33
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.602 D

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2020
Abate by
May 5, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,398 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not ensure that each employee operating a powered industrial vehicle had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l): Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178. and as referenced by the note contained in 1926.602(d).   On or about January 09, 2020, an untrained employee was allowed to a (Bobcat) mini excavator at the site without having received formal instruction, including operator evaluation to determine the retention of the information.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5398

1926.651 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,096 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22 m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62 m) of lateral travel for employees:       On or about January 09, 2020, employees using a warming torch to thaw a sewer line at a depth of approximately 5.5 to 7 were not provided a safe way to exit the trench. Equipment such as, but not limited to; a ladder for entering or exiting the trench was not available at the site location.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $8096

1926.651 J01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $9,446 · Current $4,724 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(1): Adequate protection was not provided to protect employees from loose rock or soil that could pose a hazard by falling or rolling from an excavation face.  Such protection did not consist of scaling to remove loose material; installation of protective barricades at intervals as necessary on the face to stop and contain falling material; or other means that provide equivalent protection:    On or about January 09, 2020, while in the process of using a warming torch to thaw a sewer line, an employee who was working at the excavation face; was not protected from hazards created by loose material falling and/or rolling into the trench. Soil sloughing was visibly at the excavation face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4724
  • — Z (S) $9446

1926.651 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $9,446 · Current $4,724 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary:      On or about January 09, 2020, the employer failed to ensure that employees in the process of unthawing a sewer line at a residential property located at 13611 Ellwood Ave. in Cleveland, OH, were protected from excavated material (the spoil pile) falling and/or rolling into the trench. The spoil pile was placed at the edge of the trench.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4724
  • — Z (S) $9446

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $9,446 · Current $4,724 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems, hazardous atmospheres, or other hazardous conditions:    On or about January 09, 2020, an inspection of the trench was not conducted by a competent person as needed throughout the shift for evidence of situations that could result in possible cave-ins. While in the process of completing plumbing activities, which required employees to dig a trench in order to unthaw a sewer line; soil sloughing was visible at the excavation face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4724
  • — Z (S) $9446

1926.652 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $9,446 · Current $4,724 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652 (b) or (c):    On or about January 09,2020, at a jobsite located at 13611 Ellwood Ave. in Cleveland, OH; the employer did not ensure that adequate cave-in protection was used to protect employees working inside of a trench which varied in depths of 5.5 to 7 feet, during plumbing activities that required the thawing of a sewer line. Additionally a ladder, which could have been used for entry and/or egress was available at the jobsite thus increasing the potential of exposure to hazards created by the inadequately protected trench.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4724
  • — Z (S) $9446

View Mayes & Sons Plumbing CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344599261.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.