Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: LESLEH PRECISION INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of LESLEH PRECISION INC. in 430 JONATHAN WILLEY ROAD, BELLE VERNON, PA 15012 (NAICS 332994). OSHA activity number 344602552.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lesleh Precision INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lesleh Precision INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
430 JONATHAN WILLEY ROAD
City
BELLE VERNON
State
PA
ZIP
15012
Mailing
430 JONATHAN WILLEY ROAD, BELLE VERNON, PA 15012
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332994
Employees
48
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2020
Abate by
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,398 · Current $3,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:      a) In the Facility, on or about February 3, 2020 - The employer did not verify through a written certification that the required personal protective equipment hazard assessment had been performed.  Employees at the facility use personal protective equipment including but not limited to respirators, safety glasses and gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3200
  • · Z (S) $5398

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2020
Abate by
Feb 24, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:   a) Polishing Room, on or about February 3, 2020 - The employer did not ensure that employees use appropriate eye protection during sanding/finishing operations.  An employee was observed performing sanding operations without approved safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2020
Abate by
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $2,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a)  In the Facility, on or about February 3, 2020 - The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures when employees were required to use a respirator in the workplace.  Employees are required to use tight fitting full face and half mask respirators in the Black Oxide Room.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2800
  • · Z (S) $4048

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2020
Abate by
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a)  In the Facility, on or about February 3, 2020 - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee is required to use a respirator in the workplace.  Employees are required to use tight fitting full face and half mask respirators in the Black Oxide Room.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2020
Abate by
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a)  In the Facility, on or about February 3, 2020 - The employer did not provide a fit test to employees who are required to use a tight fitting respirator in the workplace.  Employees are required to use tight fitting full face and half mask respirators in the Black Oxide Room.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2020
Abate by
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide annual respirator training to employees who are required to use a respirator in the workplace:   a)  In the Facility, on or about February 3, 2020 - The employer did not provide respirator training to employees who are required to use a tight fitting respirator in the workplace.  Employees are required to use tight fitting full face and half mask respirators in the Black Oxide Room.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2020
Abate by
Mar 19, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  a)  In the Facility, on or about February 3, 2020 - The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators as presented in Appendix D to employees who wear dust masks voluntarily at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,588 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a)  Black Oxide Room, on or about February 3, 2020 - The employer did not provide suitable facilities for flushing of the eyes and body when employees were exposed to Luster-On Cleaner 242, Penetrate Ultra, and Muriatic Acid, all of which contain corrosive materials.  The employer's eye wash and shower station were not located within the work area in that it was not located on the same level as the hazard.    ABATEMENT NOTE:    Refer to ANSI Z. 358.1-2009 Eyewash Station which states that "The safety showers and/or eyewash stations must be located on the same level as the hazard and the path of travel shall be free from obstructions."
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $4588

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2020
Abate by
Feb 28, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,096 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a)  Polishing Room, on or about February 6, 2020 - The employer did not provide machine guarding to protect the operator of the hazard of rotating parts on the Scotch Brite finishing wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5000
  • · Z (S) $8096

1910.1200 F06

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,441 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier, signal word, and hazard statements:    a)  Outside of Polishing Room, on or about February 3, 2020 - The 40 gallon tank of Gentech Non-Flammable Vapor Degreasing Solvent was not labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and hazard statement.    b)  In the Black Oxide Room, on or about February 3, 2020 - The dip tanks containing Luster-On Cleaner 242 (cleaner), Pentrate Ultra (salt), Pen Dip 300 (oil) and Hasa Muriatic Acid were not labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and hazard statement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $3441

View Lesleh Precision INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344602552.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.