Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: SAMUEL, SON & CO. (USA) INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SAMUEL, SON & CO. (USA) INC. in 1500 COINING DR., TOLEDO, OH 43612 (NAICS 331111). OSHA activity number 344609300.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Samuel, SON & CO. (USA) INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Samuel, SON & CO. (USA) INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1500 COINING DR.
City
TOLEDO
State
OH
ZIP
43612
Mailing
1500 COINING DR., TOLEDO, OH 43612
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331111
Employees
52
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2020
Abate by
May 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,675 · Current $6,506 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6)    a) On or about November 26, 2019, the employer did not ensure that energy control application steps to control the electrical energy source were implemented prior to maintenance and servicing tasks being performed on the 6540 slitting head.  Employees were exposed to crushing hazards between the slitter rollers when wrapping carpet around the slitter head to cover the knives while eneregized.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6506
  • · Z (S) $8675

1910.147 C07 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2020
Abate by
May 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,675 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:    a) On or about November 26, 2019, the employer did not ensure that employees were trained as authorized employees prior to performing set up tasks on the 6540 slitting head.  Employees were exposed to crushing hazards between the slitter rollers when wrapping carpet around the slitter head to cover the knives while eneregized.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $8675

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 52 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2020
Abate by
May 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $6,506
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    a) On or about November 26, 2019, the employer did not conduct annual audits of its energy control procedure to unsure that proper lockout/tagout procedures and requirements were being followed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $6506
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 8, 2020
Abate by
May 1, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,675 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) On or about February 5, 2020, the employer did not ensure the slitter 6540 was adequately guarded to prevent employees from struck-by and crushing hazards.  It was found that the interlock on the door at the entry table/slitter area was broken and not connected correctly.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $8675

View Samuel, SON & CO. (USA) INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344609300.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.