Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: W.E. MARSHALL COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of W.E. MARSHALL COMPANY in 1705 BELLE MEADE COURT, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30043 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 344612924.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch W.E. Marshall Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for W.E. Marshall Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1705 BELLE MEADE COURT
City
LAWRENCEVILLE
State
GA
ZIP
30043
Mailing
1705 BELLE MEADE COURT, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30043
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
12
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2020
Abate by
Apr 29, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $1,203 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting.  On 2/5/2020, at the Lawrenceville facility, the employer did not provide a fire extinguisher training program for employees expected to use extinguishers during incipient level fire fighting.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1202.76
  • · Z (S) $2313

1910.179 J02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2020
Abate by
Apr 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $1,203 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): A certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, was not maintained.  On 2/5/2020, employees were using hoist hooks that had not been inspected and maintained in a safe condition. Two hooks in use were missing safety latches.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1202.76
  • · Z (S) $2313

1910.179 J02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2020
Abate by
Apr 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed.  On 2/5/2020, the employer did not maintain inspection records for the hoist chains used on the 2 ton hoist in the shop area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2020
Abate by
Apr 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $1,203 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.  On 2/5/2020, in the production shop area, the employer did not ensure machines were equipped with machine guarding. Instances included:  a - the Lathe b - the Band Saw
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1202.76
  • · Z (S) $2313

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2020
Abate by
Apr 29, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $1,192 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.    On 2/5/20, at the 4550 Lawrenceville Georgia location, the employer did not implement a written Hazard Communication program for employees using hazardous chemicals at the site including cleaners/degreasers, enamel paints, and acetone.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1191.72
  • · Z (S) $2313

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2020
Abate by
Apr 29, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.  On 2/5/20, at the 4550 Lawrenceville Georgia location, the employer did not implement a written Hazard Communication program for employees using hazardous chemicals at the site including cleaners/degreasers, enamel paints, and acetone.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2020
Abate by
Apr 29, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  On 2/5/20, at the 4550 Lawrenceville Georgia location, the employer did not implement a written Hazard Communication program for employees using hazardous chemicals at the site including cleaners/degreasers, enamel paints, and acetone.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2020
Abate by
Apr 29, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use.  On 2/5/2020, at the Lawrenceville facility, where employees were using tight fitting 1/2 mask respirators, the employer did not implement a program including medical evaluations, fit testing, cartridge change schedules and training.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation.  On 2/5/2020, the employer did not certify employees designated to operate the sit down forklift that was in use at the job site.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344612924.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.