Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: GLOBAL VESSEL AND TANK, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GLOBAL VESSEL AND TANK, LLC in 109 KODAK BLVD, LONGVIEW, TX 75602 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 344617261.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Global Vessel and Tank, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Global Vessel and Tank, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
109 KODAK BLVD
City
LONGVIEW
State
TX
ZIP
75602
Mailing
109 KODAK BLVD., LONGVIEW, TX 75602
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
70
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 C05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 30, 2020
Abate by
May 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $6,940 · Current $3,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(5): Electrical equipment not approved for locations containing both deposits of readily ignitable residues and explosive vapors was present in spraying area(s):    (a) In the paint building, a Genie model GS-2632 scissor lift that was used during spray painting of tanks was not approved for locations containing deposits of readily ignitable residues and explosive vapors.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3470
  • · Z (S) $6940

1910.107 M01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 30, 2020
Abate by
Jun 17, 2020
Penalty
Initial $6,940 · Current $3,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(m)(1): Spraying operations involving the use of dual component coatings were not conducted in approved sprinklered spray booths meeting the requirements of this section:    (a) In the paint building, employees sprayed tanks with a two-part polyurethane coating, and the operation was not conducted in an approved sprinklered spray booth meeting the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.107.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3470
  • · Z (S) $6940

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 30, 2020
Abate by
May 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,205 · Current $2,605 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used, and at least annually thereafter:    (a) In the paint building, employees who wore Binks Millenium 3000 half-mask elastomeric facepiece respirators during painting operations had not received a respirator fit test with that respirator make and model.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2605
  • · Z (S) $5205

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 30, 2020
Abate by
May 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  (a) In the paint building, employees painting tanks wore tight-fitting respirators with facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 30, 2020
Abate by
May 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(ii): Corrective glasses, goggles or other personal protective equipment were worn in a manner that interfered with the seal of the respirator facepiece:  (a) In the paint building, employees painting tanks wore a head sock that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344617261.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.