LEWISTON, ID —
OSHA Inspection: CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION in 803 MILL ROAD, LEWISTON, ID 83501 (NAICS 322121). OSHA activity number 344617493.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLEARWATER PAPER CORPORATION
- Site address
- 803 MILL ROAD
- City
- LEWISTON
- State
- ID
- ZIP
- 83501
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1126, LEWISTON, ID 83501
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 322121
- Employees
- 1500
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 D03 I G
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
0640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(G): Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include material and energy balances for processes built after May 26, 1982: (a) Lurgi Plant: The employer had not conducted an evaluation to determine how much caustic was needed to prevent a worst-case release of chlorine-containing gas to the atmosphere. Oversaturation of the Lurgi scrubber may expose employees to released chlorine-containing gas. Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices. (a) Lurgi Plant: The employer has not identified and followed Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Engineering Practices (RAGAGEP) when determining the quantity of chlorine-containing gas released and the affected area. (b) Lurgi Plant: The employer has not identified and followed Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Engineering Practices (RAGAGEP) for chlorine monitor maintenance and calibration. (c) Lurgi Building: The employer has not identified and followed Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Engineering Practices (RAGAGEP) to determine the amount of caustic required for an emergency condition. Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 E03 III
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
0640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iii): The process hazard analysis did not address engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationships such as appropriate application of detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases. (a) Lurgi Plant: The employer has not evaluated and documented how chlorine-containing gas releases from the Lurgi Scrubber will be detected in the process hazard analysis (PHA). Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
1910.119 E03 IV
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iv): The process hazard analysis did not address the consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls: (a) Lurgi Plant: The employer did not analyze the effects of incorrect positioning of valve HCV 5145 in the process hazard analysis (PHA). (b) Lurgi Plant: The employer did not analyze the effects of multiple and consecutive HCl Synthesis Unit burner trips on the operation of the Lurgi scrubber in the process hazard analysis (PHA). Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 F01
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
0640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and addressing at least steps for each operating phase, safe operating limits, safety and health considerations, and safety systems and their functions as outlined by this paragraph: (a) Lurgi Plant: The employer did not develop and implement a standard operating procedure detailing the frequency and method to determine that valve HCV 5145 is in the correct position. Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $13,494 · Current $11,470 Reduced
0640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish or implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment: a) Lurgi Plant: The employer has not developed procedures for preventative maintenance and inspections performed on valve HCV 5145 and the valve position controller. Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $11469.9
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
1910.119 J04 I
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): Inspections and tests were not performed on process equipment: (a) Lurgi Plant: The employer did not perform inspections on valve HCV 5145 and the valve position controller. Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): Inspections and testing procedures performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP): (a) Lurgi Plant: The employer did not identify and follow Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Engineering Practices (RAGAGEP) for the calibration of chlorine area monitors. Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 J04 IV
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iv): The employer did not document each inspection and test that was performed on process equipment wherein the documentation identified the date of the inspection or test, the name of the person who performed the inspection or test, the serial number or other identifier of the equipment on which the inspection or test was performed, a description of the inspection or test performed, and the results of the inspection or test. (a) Lurgi Plant: The employer did not document the results of chlorine area monitor calibrations. (b) Lurgi Plant: The employer did not document inspection and preventative maintenance for valve HCV 5145. Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 M04 IV
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(m)(4)(iv): The report of the incident investigation for a release that resulted in, or could reasonably have resulted in a catastrophic release of highly hazardous chemical in the workplace did not include factors that contributed to the incident: (a) Lurgi Plant: The employer failed to identify the HCl synthesis burner tripping multiple times as a potential cause of the over saturation of the Lurgi scrubber on January 6, 2020. Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
1910.119 M06
- Issued
- Jul 6, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
0640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(m)(6): The employer did not review incident findings with all affected personnel whose job tasks are relevant to the incident including contract employees where applicable. (a) Lurgi Plant: The employer did not review findings from the incident that occurred on January 6, 2020 with Lurgi operators and Lurgi helpers. Note: Abatement documentation and certification are required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $13494
- — Z (S) $13494
More inspections at Clearwater Paper Corporation
View Clearwater Paper Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 322121)
More inspections in ID
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344617493.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.