OSHA Inspection: AVIATION INTERIOR GROUP, LLC

Issued

Jun 3, 2020

Penalty

Initial $1,735 · Current $1,041 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met      a). Facility: On or about 2/18/2020, the employees were exposed to chemical hazards, in that a written hazard communication program was not implemented to employees handling hazardous chemicals such as Naphtha.

Issued

Jun 3, 2020

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v)  a) Finishing Area: On or about 2/18/2020, the employees were exposed to chemical hazards, in that secondary chemical bottles were not properly labeled when employees are handling hazardous chemicals such as Naphtha.

Issued

Jun 3, 2020

Abate by

Jun 26, 2020

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:   a) Finishing Area: On or about 2/18/2020, the employees were exposed to chemical hazards, in that training, which would include an explanation of the safety data sheet was not provided to employees who are required to handle hazardous chemicals such as Naphtha.

Issued

Jun 3, 2020

Abate by

Jul 13, 2020

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a) Paint Booth - On or about 2/18/2020, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to upper respiratory irritation, in that medical evaluations were not provided to employees prior to wearing 3M tight fitting half-face respirators.

Issued

Jun 3, 2020

Abate by

Jul 13, 2020

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):     (a) Paint Booth - On or about 2/18/2020, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to upper respiratory irritation, in that FIT tests were not provided to employees prior to wearing 3M tight fitting half-face respirators.