Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: BRADLEY BLINDS, INC. DBA BRADLEY POWDER COATING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BRADLEY BLINDS, INC. DBA BRADLEY POWDER COATING in 125 THUNDERBIRD LANE #4, EAST PEORIA, IL 61611 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 344629688.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bradley Blinds, INC. DBA Bradley Powder Coating for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bradley Blinds, INC. DBA Bradley Powder Coating is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
125 THUNDERBIRD LANE #4
City
EAST PEORIA
State
IL
ZIP
61611
Mailing
125 THUNDERBIRD LANE #4, EAST PEORIA, IL 61611
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2020
Abate by
May 21, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,735 · Current $1,735
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about February 13, 2020, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards and required to wear 3M Air-Purifying Half Mask Respirators while applying powder coat material with a pneumatic spray gun and the employer had not developed a worksite specific written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1735

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2020
Abate by
May 21, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate respiratory hazards in the workplace to include a reasonable estimate of employee exposure to respiratory hazards and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  On or about February 13, 2020, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards and required to wear 3M Air-Purifying Half Mask Respirators while applying powder coat material with a pneumatic spray gun and the employer had not conducted an evaluation of the work area to determine levels of airborne contaminants.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2020
Abate by
May 21, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about February 13, 2020, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards and required to wear 3M Air-Purifying Half Mask Respirators while applying powder coat material with a pneumatic spray gun and the employer had not provided for medical evaluations of each employee prior to initial use of respirators.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2020
Abate by
May 21, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about February 13, 2020, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards and required to wear 3M Air-Purifying Half Mask Respirators while applying powder coat material with a pneumatic spray gun and the employer had not ensured employees were fit tested with the respirator prior to initial use.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2020
Abate by
May 21, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii):  On or about February 13, 2020, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards and required to wear 3M Air-Purifying Half Mask Respirators while applying powder coat material with a pneumatic spray gun and the employer had not conducted training with employees covering requirements of the standard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2020
Abate by
May 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  On or about February 13, 2020, employees operated a Nissan sit down forklift and the employer did not maintain a certification record of training.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344629688.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.