BULVERDE, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: REYNALDO ARRIOLA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of REYNALDO ARRIOLA in 3528 VUITTON, BULVERDE, TX 78163 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344633136.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- REYNALDO ARRIOLA
- Site address
- 3528 VUITTON
- City
- BULVERDE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78163
- Mailing
- 310 CLIFFORD CT., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78210
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,735 · Current $1,735
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: On or about February 14, 2020, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from falling objects, while not being protected by protective helmets from overhead hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1735
1926.102 A02
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,735 · Current $1,735
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye protection that provided side protection when there is a hazard from flying objects: a) Front side of the residential construction site: On or about February 14, 2020, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a struck-by flying projectile hazard, while using a steel hammer to break bricks without safety glasses. b) Right side of the residential construction site: On or about February 14, 2020, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a struck-by flying projectile hazard, while using Makita circular saws to cut concrete blocks without safety glasses. c) Left side of the residential construction site: On or about February 14, 2020, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard, while mixing White Masonry Cement, Type N, without safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1735
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds shall be fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as follows: Front side of the residential construction site: On or about February 14, 2020 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while performing masonry work without the scaffold being fully planked.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2892
1926.451 C02 I
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement: Entrance of a residential construction site: On or about February 14, 2020 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to fall hazards, while installing bricks on the exterior wall from a scaffold without base plates.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2892
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:Note: This requirement does not apply to float (ship) scaffolds where an edging of 3/4 inch x 1 1/2 inch (2 x 4 cm) wood or equivalent was used in lieu of toeboards: Front side of the residential construction site: On or about February 14, 2020, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a struck-by falling objects hazard, while performing masonry work without the use of toeboards to prevent materials from falling on employees working below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2892
1926.1153 D02 I
- Issued
- Mar 20, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,735 · Current $1,735
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section: East side of the residential construction site: On or about February 14, 2020, employees were exposed to a respiratory hazard while mixing White Masonry Cement, Type N, which contains silica without performing an employee exposure assessment to respirable silica.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1735
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344633136.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.