MOUNT VERNON, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: LJ&M CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LJ&M CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 31 S. 8TH AVE., MOUNT VERNON, NY 10550 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 344641295.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LJ&M CONSTRUCTION CORP.
- Site address
- 31 S. 8TH AVE.
- City
- MOUNT VERNON
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10550
- Mailing
- 138-08 95TH AVE., JAMAICA, NY 11435
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $3,856 · Current $2,417 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access: location: front of building on or about: 2/20/20 a) Employees were installing siding from pump jack scaffolds. The employees were not provided with adequate access. The employees were using the hand cranks to raise and lower the scaffold. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2417
- · Z (S) $3856
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,398 · Current $3,374 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee was not protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. location: exterior of house on or about: 2/20/20 a) Employees, installing siding from pump jack scaffolds, were not provided without fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of up to 19 feet. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3374
- · Z (S) $5398
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $1,445 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. location: exterior of house on or about: 2/20/20 a) Employees were working from pump jack scaffolds. The pump jack scaffolds were not bracecd at the bottom of the poles. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1445
- · Z (S) $2313
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $1,445 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access. location: side of house on or about: 2/20/20 a) Employees were using a Werner extension ladder to access a pump jack scaffold. The ladder did not extend 3 ft. above the landing. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1445
- · Z (S) $2313
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $1,445 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for the purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: location: side of house on or about: 2/20/20 a) Employees were using a Werner extension ladder, while engaged in exterior siding work. The lanyard, connecting the 2 flys of ladder, was missing. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1445
- · Z (S) $2313
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,398 · Current $3,374 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Location: roof On or about: 2/20/20 a) Employees were working on the roof, while engaged in exterior siding work. The employees, who was not provided with fall protection, were exposed to a fall of 24 feet. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3374
- · Z (S) $5398
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344641295.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.