KANSAS CITY, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: RA MATLOCK CONSTRUCTION LLC
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of RA MATLOCK CONSTRUCTION LLC in 5904 NW 107TH ST, KANSAS CITY, MO 64154 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 344644265.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RA MATLOCK CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 5904 NW 107TH ST
- City
- KANSAS CITY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64154
- Mailing
- 10909 N HARRISON ST, KANSAS CITY, MO 64155
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 22, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: Worksite located at 5904 NW 107th St, KC MO -- Employee was installing soffit above front entrance of the residential house with no visible means of fall protection. The employee was exposed to fall distance of 8 feet to the ground. The employer failed to provide infeasibility/greater hazard and/or failed to develop and implement a satisfactory fall protection plan under 1926.502(k). The employer should have installed a guardrail system to protect the employee from any fall hazards, as there was no where to anchor a lanyard system to. This was documented on or about 02/19/2020.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 22, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Worksite located at 5904 NW 107th St, KC MO -- Employee using portable aluminum extension ladder to gain access to the roof of the residential house. The ladder was not extended 3 feet above the landing surface, in this case, the roof. Employee was exposed to fall hazards. This was documented on or about 02/19/2020.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344644265.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.