Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BROTHERS J&P FRAMING INC. JAIME & PEDRO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BROTHERS J&P FRAMING INC. JAIME & PEDRO in 87 RAND COURT, LIDO BEACH, NY 11561 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 344646351.

Watch Brothers J&P Framing INC. Jaime & Pedro — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brothers J&P Framing INC. Jaime & Pedro is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
87 RAND COURT
City
LIDO BEACH
State
NY
ZIP
11561
Mailing
97 GROVE STREET, HEMPSTEAD, NY 11550
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1735.00 · Current $986.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) Worksite, 87 Rand Court, Lido Beach, NY: Employees walking and working under construction where there was possible danger of head injury from impact of falling/flying objects such as tools, roofing, and other construction materials were not protected by protective helmets; on or about 2/21/2020.  NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $986
  • — C (S) $1735
  • — Z (S) $1735

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4048.00 · Current $2086.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.   a) Worksite, 87 Rand Court, Lido Beach, NY: Employee framing the roof of a residential home was working on scaffolding planks approximately 10 ft. above the second floor platform.  The employee was not protected from falling over the edge of the home, approximately 24ft to the ground below; on or about 2/21/2020.  Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer needs not to submit abatement certification or documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1909.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2086
  • — C (S) $4048
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4048.00 · Current $2086.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) Worksite, 87 Rand Court, Lido Beach, NY: Employee framing the dormer of a residential home was working on the edge of the roof approximately 24ft. above the ground below without fall protection; on or about 2/21/2020.  b) Worksite, 87 Rand Court, Lido Beach, NY: Employee framing the dormer of a residential home was working on the edge of the 1st floor platform  approximately 14ft. above the ground below without fall protection; on or about 2/21/2020.  Note:  Because abatement of this violation was already documented in the case file, the employer need not to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2086
  • — C (S) $4048
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.1052 C01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1735.00 · Current $986.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail:   a) Worksite, 87 Rand Court, Lido Beach, NY: Employee entering building was using a staircase (approximately 6 steps) with no handrail; on or about 2/21/2020.   Note: The employer is required to provide abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $986
  • — C (S) $1735
  • — Z (S) $1735

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2892.00 · Current $1086.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) Worksite, 87 Rand Court, Lido Beach, NY:  Employee used an extension ladder that was extended approximately 1ft. above the landing surface; on or about 2/21/2020.   Note:   Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1086
  • — C (S) $2892
  • — Z (S) $2892

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344646351.