Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: MARDO MASONRY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARDO MASONRY, INC. in 834 WEST NORTH AVENUE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344649132.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mardo Masonry, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mardo Masonry, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARDO MASONRY, INC.
Site address
834 WEST NORTH AVENUE
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15212
Mailing
111 ANKROM ROAD, WAYNESBURG, PA 15370
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
30
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $6,073 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means:   a) Job site, 834 West North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about February 24, 2020, during masonry activities, the employer did not ensure that a scaffold, determined to be at approximately 30 feet high and 5 feet wide, was in some way restrained from tipping over.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2500
  • · C (S) $6073
  • · Z (S) $6073

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $6,073 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level:   a) Job site, 834 West North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about February 24, 2020, during masonry activities at the top of the 3rd scaffold frame, the employer did not ensure that appropriate fall protection systems/devices were provided in an area where 2 scaffolds met, exposing an employee to a fall hazard of up to approximately 19 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2500
  • · C (S) $6073
  • · Z (S) $6073

1926.451 G04 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(ii): The top edge height of top rails or equivalent member on supported scaffolds manufactured or placed in service after January 1, 2000 was not installed between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 45 inches (1.2 m) above the platform surface:   a) Job site, 834 West North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about February 24, 2020, during masonry activities just above the top of the 2nd scaffold frame, the employer did not ensure that appropriate fall protection systems/devices were used in that a metal bracket determined to be approximately 30 inches tall from the scaffold planking was used for fall protection, exposing an employee to a fall hazard of up to approximately 12 feet, 8 inches.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G04 XV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Crossbracing alone was permitted to be used for fall protection where the center point was determined to be between 38 and 48 inches from the scaffold deck and no midrail was provided:    a) Job site, 834 West North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about February 24, 2020, during masonry activities on top of the 3rd scaffold frame, the employer did not ensure that a midrail was provided on a scaffold where the center point of the bracing was determined to be approximately 47 inches high from the scaffold deck and no other fall protection was in use, exposing an employee to a fall hazard of up to approximately 19 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,643 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   a) Job site, 834 West North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about February 24, 2020, during masonry activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee used appropriate fall protection systems/devices while on top of some masonry blocks, where a fall hazard of up to approximately 8 feet, 7 inches existed.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1000
  • · C (S) $3643
  • · Z (S) $3643

1926.454 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2020
Abate by
Apr 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:   a) Job site, 834 West North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about February 24, 2020, during masonry activities on a scaffold, the employer did not ensure that an employee was provided appropriate scaffold training, exposing the employee to hazards including, but not limited to, scaffold tip overs and fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2020
Abate by
Apr 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards that enabled each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and that trained each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   a) Job site, 834 West North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about February 24, 2020, during masonry activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee was provided appropriate fall protection training, exposing him to a fall hazard of up to approximately 8 feet, 7 inches.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Mardo Masonry, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344649132.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.