Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: SBG MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SBG MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. in 4710 LOCUST STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19139 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 344649553.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch SBG Management Services, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SBG Management Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4710 LOCUST STREET
City
PHILADELPHIA
State
PA
ZIP
19139
Mailing
P.O. BOX 549, ABINGTON, PA 19001
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2020
Abate by
Jul 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:  a) Jobsite  The employer did not ensure that an energized (approximately 120 volts) duplex electrical wall outlet was used in accordance with its listing and labeling. The employer allowed employees to energize their tools and equipment with an unmounted and or unsecured wall outlet thus exposing employees to shock and or fire hazards.  Observed on or about 13 FEB 2020.   b) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that an energized (approximately 120 volts) duplex electrical wall outlet was used in accordance with its listing and labeling. The employer allowed employees to energize their tools and equipment with a wall outlet without a mounted and secured outlet/junction box thus exposing employees to shock and or fire hazards.  Observed on or about 13 FEB 2020.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2892

1926.850 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2020
Abate by
Jul 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR 1926.850(a): Evidence in writing was not available that an engineering survey performed by a competent person had been performed prior to permitting employee(s) to start demolition operations:  a) Jobsite -  The employer did not ensure a written engineering survey was performed on the building before allowing the employees to start interior demolition activities. This condition exposed employees to struck-by and caught-in-between hazards.  Noted on or about 13 FEB 2020.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4048

1926.850 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2020
Abate by
Jul 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.850(c): All electric, gas, water, steam, sewer, and other service lines were not shut off, capped, or otherwise controlled, outside the building line before demolition work was started. In each case, any utility company which was involved was not notified in advance.   a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that the electrical utilities were shut off and removed to the outside of the building when interior demolition began exposing employees to electrical hazards.  Observed on or about 13 FEB 2020.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.850 G

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2020
Abate by
Jul 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
29 CFR 1926.850(g): Wall openings in a structure being demolished were not protected to a height of approximately 42 inches:  a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure that employees throwing debris into dumpsters were protected from falling through wall openings by installing safety bars over the openings, exposing employees to fall hazards of approximately twenty (30) feet.  Observed on or about 13 FEB 2020.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2892

1926.850 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 6, 2020
Abate by
Jul 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.850(k): Employee(s) entrance(s) to multi-story structures being demolished were not protected by sidewalk sheds or canopies or both:  a) Jobsite - The employer did not ensure all entrances and walkways still utilized by employees were protected by canopies from debris that was thrown from second and third floor windows into street-level dumpsters. Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when walking from the parking locations to the entrance of the second building.  Observed on or about 13 FEB 2020.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344649553.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.