CINCINNATI, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: MAGNOLIO DE LEON
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MAGNOLIO DE LEON in 1008 PRESTWICK PLACE, CINCINNATI, OH 45245 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344669338.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAGNOLIO DE LEON
- Site address
- 1008 PRESTWICK PLACE
- City
- CINCINNATI
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45245
- Mailing
- 3609 W. 8TH ST. APT 2, CINCINNATI, OH 45202
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a.) On or about March 3, 2020, employees were exposed to a 21 foot 1 inch as well as an 11 foot fall hazard while installing shingles on a 6/12 pitched residential roof. The exposed employees were wearing body harnesses that were not connected to lifelines or roof anchors.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. a.) On or about March 03, 2020, employees were not trained to recognize fall hazards such as, but not limited to, a 21 foot 1 inch and an 11 foot fall hazard while performing roofing work on a pitched roof, nor were they trained on when to utilize a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. a.) On or about March 03, 2020, employees were exposed to a fall hazard measured at 21 feet 1 inch while using an extension ladder to climb onto the unprotected edge of the roof surface without extending the side rails of the ladder at least 36 inches above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344669338.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.