Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: NOHAVA CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NOHAVA CONSTRUCTION in SPRUCEWOOD APARTMENTS 208 SPRUCE STREET, VERMILLION, SD 57069 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344673876.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nohava Construction for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nohava Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NOHAVA CONSTRUCTION
Site address
SPRUCEWOOD APARTMENTS 208 SPRUCE STREET
City
VERMILLION
State
SD
ZIP
57069
Mailing
210 2ND STREET SW, LE MARS, IA 51031
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
25
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B10

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2020
Abate by
Aug 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,398 · Current $5,398
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:    (a)Nohava Construction, Inc. at 208 Spruce Street, Vermillion, SD 57069: On or about and at times prior to March 4, 2020, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from fall hazards while installing flashing on an apartment building. The employer did not ensure that a safety monitor system was fully implemented to provide protection for employees installing flashing at the perimeter of the roof. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $5398
  • · Z (S) $5398

1926.502 H01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2020
Abate by
Aug 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(iv): The safety monitor was not close enough to communicate orally with the employee:    (a)Nohava Construction, Inc. at 208 Spruce Street in Vermillion, SD 57069: On or about and at times prior to March 4, 2020, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from fall hazards when installing flashing in that, the identified safety monitors were not close enough to communicate orally with employees installing flashing on the exterior of the building. This condition exposed employees to fall hazard of approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.502 H01 V

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2020
Abate by
Aug 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(v): The safety monitor had other responsibilities which could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function:    (a)Nohava Construction, Inc. at 208 Spruce Street, Vermillion, SD 57069: On or about and at times prior to March 4, 2020, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from fall hazards when installing flashing in that, identified safety monitors were observed installing a warning line system and assisting with installation of perimeter flashing, both activities could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344673876.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.