Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: LINCOLN INDUSTRIES OF WISCONSIN, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LINCOLN INDUSTRIES OF WISCONSIN, LLC in 2795 S 167TH ST, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 344688015.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lincoln Industries of Wisconsin, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lincoln Industries of Wisconsin, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2795 S 167TH ST
City
NEW BERLIN
State
WI
ZIP
53151
Mailing
2795 S 167TH ST, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
87
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2020
Abate by
Sep 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $9,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to the items in 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A-D)    (a) On or about March 11, 2020, the employer did not ensure that energy control procedures utilized by the maintenance team clearly and specifically outlined the following elements. The specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating and securing machines to control hazardous energy, the specific procedural steps for placement, removal, and transfer of lockout devices and the responsibility for them, or specific requirements for testing a machines or equipment to verify the effectiveness of lockout devices or other energy control measures. The lack of specific details in energy control procedures exposed maintenance employees to electrical shock hazards and contact with hazardous chemical hazards while performing such work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9500
  • — Z (S) $13494

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation.  (a) On and before March 11, 2020, the employer did not provide lockout tagout training to a new maintenance employee prior to the employee performing service and maintenance on equipment. This exposed the employee to electrical shock hazards on the first date that the employee worked in the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 F03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2020
Abate by
Aug 26, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii): Group lockout or tagout devices were not used in accordance with procedures required by 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4):  (a) On and before March 11, 2020, the employer did not ensure that group lockout or tagout devices were used during service and maintenance activities in which more than one employee was performing work on a roof-top ventilation fan which was deenergized. This exposed maintenance employees to electrical shock hazards and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2020
Abate by
Sep 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $9,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:    (a) On or about March 11, 2020, the employer did not protect the exposed parts of horizontal shafting of grinding and polishing machines with a protective stationary casing that prevented access to the drive shaft for the polishing wheel used by polishers employees. The absence of guards on these machines exposed grinding/polishing employees to caught-in hazards while polishing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9500
  • — Z (S) $13494

1910.1200 H

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2020
Abate by
Aug 26, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $9,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in     (a) On and before March 10, 2020, the employer did not provide adequate training to employees regarding the hazards of chemicals in the workplace or the location of SDSs in the work environment. This exposed employees to contact with chemical hazards without providing employees with the knowledge on where to locate important information regarding appropriate personal protective equipment requirements or how to respond in case of a chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9000
  • — Z (S) $13494

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344688015.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.