Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: FANTASIA ENTERPRISES LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FANTASIA ENTERPRISES LLC in 625 ERIE STREET S, MASSILLON, OH 44646 (NAICS 423520). OSHA activity number 344691597.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fantasia Enterprises LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fantasia Enterprises LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
625 ERIE STREET S
City
MASSILLON
State
OH
ZIP
44646
Mailing
625 ERIE STREET S, MASSILLON, OH 44646
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423520
Employees
11
Ownership type
Private (A)

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $984 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer failed to have a respiratory protection program for employees that are required to wear respirators including, but not limited to, dust masks while chiseling rocks and stones.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $984
  • · Z (S) $2313

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer failed to provide a medical evaluation to employees required to wear respirators including, but not limited to, dust masks while chiseling rocks and stones.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and at least annually thereafter:    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer failed to provide a fit test to employees who are required to wear respirators including, but not limited to, dust masks while chiseling rocks and stones.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer failed to provide respiratory protection training to employees who are required to wear respirators including, but not limited to, dust masks while chiseling rocks and stones.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,856 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer failed to identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace. Employees chisel rocks down to size and are exposed to respiratory hazards including, but not limited to, asbestos, silica, and particulate not otherwise regulated.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3856

1910.1001 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(2)(i): Each employer did not perform initial monitoring of employees who were, or could reasonably be expected to be exposed to airborne concentrations at or above the TWA permissible exposure limit and/or excursion limit:    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer failed to perform initial monitoring of employees who are reasonably expected to be exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos at or above the TWA PEL and/or excursion limit. Employee exposure was not determined during asbestos activities including, but not limited to, reducing Tiger's Eye stones to size.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1053 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(1): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section:    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer failed to assess employees' exposure to respirable crystalline silica in the workplace. Employees chisel rocks containing quartz down to size including, but not limited to, Tiger's eye stones.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,856 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer did not implement a written hazard communication program. Employees work with chemicals including, but not limited to, asbestos, silica, aluminum oxide, and cleaning supplies.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3856

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer failed to maintain safety data sheets in the workplace. Employees work with chemicals including, but not limited to, asbestos, silica, aluminum oxide, and cleaning supplies.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees. Employees work with chemicals including, but not limited to, asbestos, silica, aluminum oxide, and cleaning supplies.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:    On or about March 12, 2020, the workplace hazard assessment had not been put in writing and certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.132 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2020
Abate by
Jul 31, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment (PPE):    On or about March 12, 2020, the employer failed to provide PPE training to employees. Employees are provided PPE including, but not limited to, safety glasses, dust masks, and gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344691597.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.