Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALL TEX ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALL TEX ROOFING in 501 NAPA VALLEY, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344693650.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ALL TEX Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ALL TEX Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALL TEX ROOFING
Site address
501 NAPA VALLEY
City
LITTLE ROCK
State
AR
ZIP
72211
Mailing
4707 N COUNTS BLVD., DALLAS, TX 75211
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2020
Abate by
Sep 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   On the roof, employees were observed using Hitachi and DeWalt pneumatic nail guns without the use of eye protection.  a)  Installing felting and shingles on Building 3  b)  Installing felting and shingles on Building 4  c)  Installing felting and shingles on Building 6
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2020
Abate by
Sep 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On the roof, each employee was observed working on a 6 in 12 pitch roof performing roofing activities, did not have proper fall protection.    a)  Removing and installing shingles on Building 3  b)  Removing and installing shingles on Building 4  c)  Removing and installing shingles on Building 6
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2020
Abate by
Sep 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   At the jobsite, employees ascended and descended from the rooftop on a Werner aluminum extension ladder, which did not extend at least three feet above the rooftop landing, exposing the employee to fall hazards greater than 6 ft. to the ground below.  a) Ascending and descending the rooftop on Building 3.  b) Ascending and descending the rooftop on Building 4.  c) Ascending and descending the rooftop on Building 6.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2892

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 20, 2020
Abate by
Sep 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)   At the job site, the employer did not ensure that employees exposed to hazards associated with using   SRS Top Shield Hybrid Bonding Sealant, while applying it to roof flashing were provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial training. This condition exposed employee(s) to dermal and inhalation hazards.   a) Applying sealant on Building 3.   b) Applying sealant on Building 4.   c) Applying sealant on Building 6.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View ALL TEX Roofing's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344693650.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.