Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: ANDREWS CABINET

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ANDREWS CABINET in 4025 BELL LANE, MILTON, FL 32571 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 344699632.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Andrews Cabinet for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Andrews Cabinet is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANDREWS CABINET
Site address
4025 BELL LANE
City
MILTON
State
FL
ZIP
32571
Mailing
4025 BELL LANE, MILTON, FL 32571
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2020
Abate by
Aug 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $2,024 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    a.     Spray room and wood shop:  On or about March 12,  2020 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to eye struck by hazards, in that employees who operate spray guns, drills, sanders and saws were not protected with eye protection while exposed to eye injuries from flying debris and irritants.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2024
  • · Z (S) $4048

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2020
Abate by
Aug 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $2,024 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1530

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a. In the spray room:  On or about March 12, 2020 and at times previously, the employer required an employee to use tight fitting, half face respirators, during spraying operations without first having the employee complete a medical evaluation, exposing the employee to health hazards such as, but limited to acute and chronic respiratory injury and illness.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2024
  • · Z (S) $4048

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2020
Abate by
Aug 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer shall ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph.  a. In the spray room:  On or about March 12, 2020, and at times previously, the employer allowed employees to use  tight fitting, half face respirators, during the mixing and spray application of hazardous chemical type lacquer, sealer, and primer, without passing an appropriate  qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT), exposing the employees to health hazards such as, but limited to acute and chronic respiratory injury and illness.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2020
Abate by
Aug 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1530

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): The employer permitted respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surfaces of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function.  a.  In the spray room:   On or about March 12, 2020, and at times previously, the employer allowed employees to use a tight fitting, half face respirator, during the mixing and spray application of hazardous chemical type lacquer, sealer, and primer, with facial hair that interfered with the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face, exposing the employees to health hazards such as, but limited to acute and chronic respiratory injury and illness.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 15, 2020
Abate by
Aug 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): The employer shall provide the training prior to requiring the employee to use a respirator in the workplace.  a.  In the spray room:  On or about March 12, 2020, and at times previously, employer allowed employees to use a tight fitting, half face respirator, during the mixing and spray application of hazardous chemical type lacquer, sealer, and primer, without providing training,  exposing the employees to health hazards such as, but limited to acute and chronic respiratory injury and illness.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Andrews Cabinet's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344699632.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.