MILTON, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: ANDREWS CABINET
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ANDREWS CABINET in 4025 BELL LANE, MILTON, FL 32571 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 344699632.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANDREWS CABINET
- Site address
- 4025 BELL LANE
- City
- MILTON
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32571
- Mailing
- 4025 BELL LANE, MILTON, FL 32571
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337110
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $2,024 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a. Spray room and wood shop: On or about March 12, 2020 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to eye struck by hazards, in that employees who operate spray guns, drills, sanders and saws were not protected with eye protection while exposed to eye injuries from flying debris and irritants.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2024
- · Z (S) $4048
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $2,024 Reduced
1530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. In the spray room: On or about March 12, 2020 and at times previously, the employer required an employee to use tight fitting, half face respirators, during spraying operations without first having the employee complete a medical evaluation, exposing the employee to health hazards such as, but limited to acute and chronic respiratory injury and illness.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2024
- · Z (S) $4048
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer shall ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT) as stated in this paragraph. a. In the spray room: On or about March 12, 2020, and at times previously, the employer allowed employees to use tight fitting, half face respirators, during the mixing and spray application of hazardous chemical type lacquer, sealer, and primer, without passing an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT), exposing the employees to health hazards such as, but limited to acute and chronic respiratory injury and illness.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1530
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): The employer permitted respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surfaces of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function. a. In the spray room: On or about March 12, 2020, and at times previously, the employer allowed employees to use a tight fitting, half face respirator, during the mixing and spray application of hazardous chemical type lacquer, sealer, and primer, with facial hair that interfered with the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face, exposing the employees to health hazards such as, but limited to acute and chronic respiratory injury and illness.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): The employer shall provide the training prior to requiring the employee to use a respirator in the workplace. a. In the spray room: On or about March 12, 2020, and at times previously, employer allowed employees to use a tight fitting, half face respirator, during the mixing and spray application of hazardous chemical type lacquer, sealer, and primer, without providing training, exposing the employees to health hazards such as, but limited to acute and chronic respiratory injury and illness.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Andrews Cabinet
View Andrews Cabinet's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337110)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344699632.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.