Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES in 1 MERAMEC BLUFFS DRIVE, BALLWIN, MO 63021 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 344725072.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lutheran Senior Services — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lutheran Senior Services is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 MERAMEC BLUFFS DRIVE
City
BALLWIN
State
MO
ZIP
63021
Mailing
LUTHERAN SENIOR SERVICES 1150 HANLEY INDUSTRIAL COURT, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63114
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
400
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 A02

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2020
Abate by
May 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $6,747 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2): A respirator was not provided to each employee when such equipment was necessary to protect the health of such employee:  a)  The employer failed to supply adequate respiratory protection equipment to employees exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus known to cause COVID-19.  On or about April 16, 2020, the employer did not provide N95 respirators to all staff who provided care to residents who displayed COVID-19 symptoms and/or were known to be COVID-19 positive.  The employer allowed staff to choose between cloth face coverings, surgical masks, or N95 respirators when exposed to residents who displayed COVID-19 symptoms and/or were known to be COVID-19 positive.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $6747
  • — C (S) $13494
  • — Z (S) $13494

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2020
Abate by
May 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a)  The employer failed to develop a written respiratory protection program for employees who were required to wear N95 respirators to protect them from exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus known to cause COVID-19.  On or about April 16, 2020, the employer did not establish a written respiratory protection program when N95 respirators were required to protect staff who provided care to residents who displayed COVID-19 symptoms and/or were known to be COVID-19 positive.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2020
Abate by
May 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a)  The employer failed to provide medical evaluations for employees who were required to wear N95 respirators.  On or about April 16, 2020, the employer did not provide medical evaluations prior to the required use of N95 respirators.  Staff wore N95 respirators to provide care to residents who displayed COVID-19 symptoms and/or were known to be COVID-19 positive.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2020
Abate by
May 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  Employee(s) required to wear tight-fitting respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a)  The employer failed to fit test employees prior to the required use of N95 respirators.  On or about April 16, 2020, the employer did not provide fit tests prior to the required use of N95 respirators.  Staff wore N95 respirators to provide care to residents who displayed COVID-19 symptoms and/or were known to be COVID-19 positive.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Oct 9, 2020
Abate by
May 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1):  The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii):  a)  The employer failed to effectively train employees on information regarding the use of respirators.  On or about April 16, 2020, the employer did not provide required training prior to the required use of N95 respirators.  Staff wore N95 respirators to provide care to residents who displayed COVID-19 symptoms and/or were known to be COVID-19 positive.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Lutheran Senior Services's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344725072.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.