Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ESSEX RESIDENTIAL CARE, LLC

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of ESSEX RESIDENTIAL CARE, LLC in 165 FAIRFIELD AVE, WEST CALDWELL, NJ 07006 (NAICS 621498). OSHA activity number 344727250.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Essex Residential Care, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Essex Residential Care, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
165 FAIRFIELD AVE
City
WEST CALDWELL
State
NJ
ZIP
07006
Mailing
165 FAIRFIELD AVE, WEST CALDWELL, NJ 07006
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621498
Employees
236
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2020
Abate by
Oct 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  165 Fairfield Ave., West Caldwell, NJ, Covid-19 patient units including 1 East, 1 South, 2 East, 2 South  a) Employees, including nurses and CNAs, were provided with and required to use N-95 filtering facepiece respirators during care and treatment of patients including those under investigation and/or confirmed as Covid-19 positive.  The employer did not provide these employees with a medical evaluation to ensure that they were capable of safely wearing such respirators.   b) Employees, including housekeepers, were provided with and required to use N-95 filtering facepiece respirators while cleaning and sanitizing rooms including patient equipment such as bedrails and overbed tables of patients under investigation and/or confirmed as Covid-19 positive.  The employer did not provide these employees with a medical evaluation to ensure that they were capable of safely wearing such respirators.   Violation occurred on or about March 25, 2020 and thereafter.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $13494
  • — Z (S) $13494

1910.134 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2020
Abate by
Oct 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  165 Fairfield Ave., West Caldwell, NJ, Covid-19 patient units including 1 East, 1 South, 2 East, 2 South  a) Employees, including nurses and CNAs, were provided with and required to use N-95 filtering facepiece respirators during care and treatment of patients including those under investigation and/or confirmed as Covid-19 positive.  The employer did not provide these employees with a fit test  to ensure the respirators protected them from Covid-19.   b) Employees, including housekeepers, were provided with and required to use N-95 filtering facepiece respirators while cleaning and sanitizing rooms including patient equipment such as bedrails and overbed tables of patients under investigation and/or confirmed as Covid-19 positive.  The employer did not provide these employees with a fit test  to ensure the respirators protected them from Covid-19.   Violation occurred on or about March 25, 2020 and thereafter.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2020
Abate by
Oct 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii):  165 Fairfield Ave., West Caldwell, NJ, Covid-19 patient units including 1 East, 1 South, 2 East, 2 South  a) Employees, including nurses and CNAs, were provided with and required to use N-95 filtering facepiece respirators during care and treatment of patients  including those under investigation and/or confirmed as Covid-19 positive.  The employer did not provide these employees with effective training in topics including:   i) Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; ii) What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; iii) How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; iv) How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; v) How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators.  b)  Employees, including housekeepers, were provided with and required to use N-95 filtering facepiece respirators during cleaning and sanitizing rooms of patients those under investigation and/or confirmed as Covid-19 positive. The employer did not provide these employees with effective training in topics including:   i) Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; ii) What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; iii) How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; iv) How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; v) How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators.  Violation occurred on or about March 25, 2020 and thereafter.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344727250.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.