EASTCHESTER, NY —
OSHA Inspection: BRITO'S CONSTRUCTION, LLC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRITO'S CONSTRUCTION, LLC. in 192 OAKLAND AVENUE, EASTCHESTER, NY 10707 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344732284.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRITO'S CONSTRUCTION, LLC.
- Site address
- 192 OAKLAND AVENUE
- City
- EASTCHESTER
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10707
- Mailing
- 275 CHESTNUT STREET STORE B, NEWARK, NJ 07105
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4048.00 · Current $4048.00
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees due to a fall from an elevation. A) Exterior, Front of the structure: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25 feet while using a material hoist as a ladder, on or about January 30th, 2020. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3470.00 · Current $3470.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: A) Exterior, On the ground and lower roof: Employees were exposed to head injuries while working below roofing activities. The employees were not protected by hard hats or protective helmets, on or about January 30th, 2020. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3470
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3470.00 · Current $3470.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: A) Exterior, On the ground and the upper levels of the house: Employees were exposed to eye/face injuries while using pneumatic nail guns and electric saws and were not protected with any type of eye/face protection, on or about January 30th, 2020. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3470
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4048.00 · Current $4048.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): A) Roof of the structure: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 & 25 feet while engaged in roofing and framing work on the roof of a structure without a means of fall protection in place, on or about January 30th, 2020. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4048.00 · Current $4048.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: A) Exterior, Front of the structure: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25 feet while using a material hoist as a ladder that was not extended at least 3 feet over the landing that they were accessing, on or about January 30th, 2020. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4048
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in NY
MAYVILLE, NY—2026-07-16
MAYVILLE VILLAGE DPW
NEW HYDE PARK, NY—2026-07-16
NORTH HEMPSTEAD TN MICHAEL J TULLY PARK
CONESUS, NY—2026-07-16
CONESUS TN HIGHWAY DEPT
COMSTOCK, NY—2026-07-15
NYSDOCCS WASHINGTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
BALDWINSVILLE, NY—2026-07-15
LYSANDER TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344732284.