EDISON, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH, INC.
Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe health inspection of HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH, INC. in 65 JAMES STREET, EDISON, NJ 08820 (NAICS 622110). OSHA activity number 344765268.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH, INC.
- Site address
- 65 JAMES STREET
- City
- EDISON
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08820
- Mailing
- 343 THORNALL STREET, EDISON, NJ 08820
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Fatality or catastrophe (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 622110
- Employees
- 620
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 D01 II
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification: a) On or about 03/17/20 at the Johnson Rehabilitation Institute; employees, (such as but not limited to Registered Nurses), provided treatment or care to COVID-19 positive or Patients Under Investigation (PUI) and were required to wear tight fitting filtering facepiece respirators,(such as but not limited to respirators labels as KN-95 masks made in China), which were not NIOSH certified, exposing them to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $0
- · C (S) $13494
- · Z (S) $13494
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $13,494
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) On or about 03/17/20 at the Johnson Rehabilitation Institute; Employer could not show that medical evaluations were completed for 3 employees to determine the employees' ability to use a respirator before the employees were fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $13494
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model, or make) was used, and at least annually thereafter: a) On or about 03/17/20 at the Johnson Rehabilitation Institute; employees, (such as but not limited to Patient Care Techs, Physical Therapists, Registered Nurses ) who provided treatment or care to COVID-19 positive or Patients Under Investigation (PUI), were required to use a tight-fitting respirator, and were not fit tested prior to wearing a N-95 (such as but not limited to 3M-1860, Halyard, Cardinal, Technol), exposing them to an increased risk of material impairment such as cardiovascular stress. b) On or about 03/17/20 at the Johnson Rehabilitation Institute; employees, (such as but not limited to Registered Nurses) who provided treatment or care to COVID-19 positive or Patients Under Investigation (PUI) were required to wear different makes, sizes or style of tight fitting filtering facepiece respirators (KN-95 masks made in China and 3M masks) and were not given a either a qualitative or quantitative fit test prior to wearing these different size and style respirators exposing them to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. c) On or about 03/17/20 at the Johnson Rehabilitation Institute; employees, (such as but not limited to Registered Nurses Patient Care Techs) who provided treatment (including aerosolized nebulizer treatments) or care to COVID-19 positive or Patients Under Investigation (PUI), were required to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators (3M-1860, Halyard, Cardinal, Technol ) and were not given an annual fit test exposing them to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1904.4 A
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,928 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent. a) On or about 04/11/20, at Johnson Rehabilitation Institute; employer did not enter a work related COVID-19 illness of an employee who worked on 1 East, resulting in days away from work beginning on 03/31/20 and returning to work on 04/19/20, on the site OSHA Form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2020. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- · J (O) $0
- · C (O) $1928
- · Z (O) $1928
1904.39 A01
- Issued
- Sep 17, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,639 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(1): The employer did not report within 8-hours the death of an employee resulting from a work-related incident a) On or about 05/11/20 at the Johnson Rehabilitation Institute, employee who worked on 1 East Rehab died from complications due to COVID-19 illness, on 05/11/20 and employer reported the incident to OSHA on 05/26/20. NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- · J (O) $0
- · C (O) $9639
- · Z (O) $9639
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 622110)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344765268.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.