Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: CONARCO SERVICES LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CONARCO SERVICES LLC in 9422 ROCHELLE LANE, SPRINGBORO, OH 45066 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344791868.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Conarco Services LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Conarco Services LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9422 ROCHELLE LANE
City
SPRINGBORO
State
OH
ZIP
45066
Mailing
4553 PENSACOLA BLVD., MORAINE, OH 45439
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2020
Abate by
Sep 11, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $2,175 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.    a.)  On or about June 16, 2020, the employer failed to conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site thus exposing 4 employees to fall hazards measured to be 16 feet 10 inches, 13 feet 1 inch, and 12 feet 4 inches when working a newly constructed residential roof.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2175
  • · Z (S) $4048

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.    Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    a.)  On or about June 16, 2020, employees were exposed to fall hazards measured to be 16 feet 10 inches, 13 feet 1 inch, and 12 feet 4 inches when working a newly constructed residential roof and not using conventional fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4048

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2020
Abate by
Sep 11, 2020
Penalty
Initial $325 · Current $325
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training.  a.)  On or about June 16, 2020, the employer did not provide a written certification record for employee fall protection training.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $325
  • · Z (O) $325

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344791868.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.