BERGENFIELD, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: B & B CONTRACTING, CORP.
Programmed Related inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related health inspection of B & B CONTRACTING, CORP. in 123 HICKORY AVE., BERGENFIELD, NJ 07621 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344792403.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- B & B CONTRACTING, CORP.
- Site address
- 123 HICKORY AVE.
- City
- BERGENFIELD
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07621
- Mailing
- 20 SUNNYMEADE VILLAGE, STATEN ISLAND, NY 10305
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $3,470 · Current $3,470
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Exterior Front (Lower Roof): An employee was not wearing a protective helmet, while engaged in roofing work, was exposed to a struck by hazard to the head from employees performing roofing work above. The employer did not ensure that employees were provided with protective helmets, thus exposing employees to a head laceration, on or about 6/17/20. b) Exterior Front (Ground Level): Employees working on the ground level and below roofing work operations, were not wearing protective helmets. The employer did not ensure that employees working on the ground level, were provided with protective helmets, thus exposing employees to a head laceration, on or about 6/17/20.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3470
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $2,313
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles: a) Exterior Front: Employees engaged in roofing work utilized hand-held pneumatic nail guns, without eye and face protection. The employer did not ensure that employees using hand held pneumatic nail guns were protected with eye and face protection, thus exposing employees to an eye injury, on or about 6/17/20.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2313
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) Exterior Front (Along West Side of Home): A 28 foot Werner extension ladder used by employees to access the upper roof level, did not extend at least three feet above the roof's landing, on or about 6/17/20.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2892
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 20, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $26,987 · Current $26,987
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Exterior Front (Upper Roof): Employees engaged in roofing work on the upper roof level were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 28 feet above the lower surface, without the use of a personal fall arrest system. The employer did not ensure that employees performing roofing work were provided with a personal fall arrest system, or other means of fall protection, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard, on or about 6/17/20. b) Exterior Front (Lower Roof): An employee engaged in roofing work on the lower roof level was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet above the lower surface, without the use of a personal fall arrest system. The employer did not ensure that employees performing roofing work were provided with a personal fall arrest system, or other means of fall protection, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard, on or about 6/17/20.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (W) $26987
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344792403.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.