DUBLIN, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: MANUEL SOTO
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MANUEL SOTO in 7548 DEBBIE RUN WAY, LOT 42, DUBLIN, OH 43016 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344793658.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANUEL SOTO
- Site address
- 7548 DEBBIE RUN WAY, LOT 42
- City
- DUBLIN
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43016
- Mailing
- 755 S. WAYNE AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43204
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. a. On or about June 17, 2020, at the residential job site, Lot 42, in the Pulte Homes - Autumn Rose Woods community, the employer failed to maintain a safety and health program to ensure hazard detection and correction including, but not limited to, fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2892
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On or about June 17, 2020, at the residential job site, Lot 42, in the Pulte Homes - Autumn Rose Woods community, employees involved in framing activities on the roof were not protected against exterior falls on the back eave side of the house, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard up to 12 feet, 2.5 inches. b. On or about June 17, 2020, at the residential job site, Lot 42, in the Pulte Homes - Autumn Rose Woods community, employees involved in framing activities on the roof were not protected against exterior falls on the front eave side of the house, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard up to 12 feet, 3.5 inches. c. On or about June 17, 2020, at the residential job site, Lot 42, in the Pulte Homes - Autumn Rose Woods community, employees involved in framing activities on the roof were not protected against exterior falls over the front entry area of the house, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard up to 12 feet, 2.25 inches. d. On or about June 17, 2020, at the residential job site, Lot 42, in the Pulte Homes - Autumn Rose Woods community, employees involved in framing activities on the roof were not protected against an interior fall over the entry inside the house, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard greater than 16 feet, 5.5 inches.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344793658.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.