BRANFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: ANGEL & A, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ANGEL & A, LLC in 50 EAST MAIN STREET, BRANFORD, CT 06405 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 344801543.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANGEL & A, LLC
- Site address
- 50 EAST MAIN STREET
- City
- BRANFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06405
- Mailing
- 176 SIXTH STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Sep 25, 2020
- Abate by
- Oct 13, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $325 · Current $325
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 001b and Citation 01, Item 2b with a final order date of 8/18/2020 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 8/28/2020) following the abatement due date (8/18/2020).
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $325
- · Z (O) $325
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to work from the roof of the residence while installing exterior insulation was protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2892
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 18, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was exposed to fall hazards while working on the roof of the residence to install was trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B07
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(7): Ladder(s) that were unsecured or not provided with slip-resistant feet were used on slippery surfaces: Worksite: The employer allowed an employee to gain access to the roof by the use of a 10-foot aluminum ladder that was disassembled from an aluminum extension ladder, and the 10-foot aluminum ladder was placed on concrete surface without being secured or provided with slip-resistant feet. On or about 06/19/2020, the above 10-foot aluminum ladder was displaced while an employee was working from the ladder, causing the employee to fall from the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.1060 A01
- Issued
- Jul 23, 2020
- Abate by
- Aug 18, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were working from two (2) separate ladders that were disassembled from an aluminum extension were trained by a competent person in the proper procedures to minimize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344801543.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.