MEDFORD, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: A & M DITTRICH MINK FARM, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of A & M DITTRICH MINK FARM, INC. in N3472 GRAHL DRIVE, MEDFORD, WI 54451 (NAICS 112930). OSHA activity number 344825393.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A & M DITTRICH MINK FARM, INC.
- Site address
- N3472 GRAHL DRIVE
- City
- MEDFORD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54451
- Mailing
- N3472 GRAHL DRIVE, MEDFORD, WI 54451
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 112930
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Aug 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,446 · Current $4,725 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial trucks were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: (a) Production floor; The employer did not obtain written manufacturer approval from the forklift manufacturer before using it to support front end attachments, such as a fork mounted work platform (basket).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4725
- · Z (S) $9446
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Aug 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The user did not request, for trucks equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered: (a) Production floor; The ULINE forklift was not marked to identify the combined weight of the truck and the front end attachment at maximum elevation, with its load centered.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Aug 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition: (a) Production floor; The employer did not ensure that the ULINE forklift was equipped with a data plate that was legible to read with adequate markings.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Aug 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Sep 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): The log of occupational injuries and illnesses, (OSHA Form No. 300), was not completed in the detail provided in the form and the instructions contained therein: (a) Within the facility; Section F of the 2020 OSHA Form 300 did not identify the object(s) that caused each injury, regarding injuries recorded on February 17, 2020 and May 1, 2020.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $675
- · Z (O) $1350
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 112930)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344825393.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.