Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALEJANDRO PEREZ

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ALEJANDRO PEREZ in 3380 NOREEN DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43221 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344857941.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alejandro Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alejandro Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALEJANDRO PEREZ
Site address
3380 NOREEN DRIVE
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43221
Mailing
1725 HOPKINS AVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43223
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2020
Abate by
Sep 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or about July 24, 2020, the employer failed to maintain a safety and health program to address hazards such as fall protection during roofing activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4048.02
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2020
Abate by
Sep 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.  a. On or about July 24, 2020, the employer failed to instruct each employee in the avoidance of unsafe conditions while performing roofing activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2020
Abate by
Sep 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about July 24, 2020, employees were conducting roofing activities from elevated heights without fall protection, thereby exposing employees to an approximately 10 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4048

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2020
Abate by
Sep 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders shall be used only for the purpose for which they were designed.  a. On or about July 24, 2020, employer failed to instruct employees on the use of ladders, the ladder was used for a purpose for which it was not designed, thereby exposing the employees to a fall hazard of over 8 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4048

View Alejandro Perez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344857941.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.