Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: S SINCHE CONSTRUCTION LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of S SINCHE CONSTRUCTION LLC in 402 HICKORY WOODS LANE, STRATFORD, CT 06614 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344860390.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch S Sinche Construction LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for S Sinche Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
402 HICKORY WOODS LANE
City
STRATFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06614
Mailing
109 SAMP MORTAR DRIVE, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,048 · Current $2,834 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  Jobsite:  The employees who were installing asphalt shingles on the 8 in 12 high pitch residential roof were not protected from fall hazards approximately 11 feet 7 inches to the lower level by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2833.6
  • · Z (S) $4048

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person.   Jobsite: The anchorages used for attachment of the personal fall arrest systems were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds for each employee attached, exposing employees to fall hazards approximately 11 feet 7 inches to the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  Jobsite:  The vertical lifelines were not rigged in a manner that could prevent the employees from free falling approximately 11 feet 7 inches to the lower level while reroofing the 8 in 12 high pitch roof.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2020
Abate by
Oct 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $1,619 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite:  The employees exposed to fall hazards while performing roofing work were not provided with information and training to enable to recognize the hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1619.1
  • · Z (S) $2313

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344860390.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.