Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EDUARDO BONILLA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDUARDO BONILLA in 7593 HASTINGS STREET LOT 115, PICKERINGTON, OH 43147 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344871579.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eduardo Bonilla — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eduardo Bonilla is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EDUARDO BONILLA
Site address
7593 HASTINGS STREET LOT 115
City
PICKERINGTON
State
OH
ZIP
43147
Mailing
3133 CLERMONT ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43227
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2020
Abate by
Sep 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,470 · Current $3,470
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about August 5, 2020, for the 7593 Hastings Street, Lot 115, Pickerington, Ohio worksite: two workers performing roofing installation were not protected against falls. There were no guardrail systems, or safety net systems installed. One worker attempted use of a fall arrest system without adequate anchorage point (the vertical lifeline was tied to a roof truss) and with use of an unapproved "mountain climbing belt" in lieu of a body harness. The second worker was completely unprotected. Due to these conditions, the workers were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately ten feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3470

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2020
Abate by
Sep 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $2,313
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  a. On or about August 5, 2020, for the 7593 Hastings Street, Lot 115, Pickerington, Ohio worksite; the employer failed to provide a training program for fall hazard recognition and the specific procedures to be followed to minimize fall hazards. During roofing installation, three workers had exposure to fall hazards of approximately 15 feet at the worksite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2020
Abate by
Sep 30, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $2,313
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  On or about August 5, 2020, for the 7593 Hastings Street, Lot 115, Pickerington, Ohio worksite: Ladders used for access to upper landing surfaces, such as rooftops under construction, did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface, were not secured at the top and did not have a grasping device installed:  a. at the back of the home under construction for the single story gable roof surface; and b. at the front of the home under construction for the single story roof at the building front porch entrance area.  Due to these conditions, workers using the ladders for access to perform roofing installation were exposed to fall hazards up to approximately 15 feet during use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

View Eduardo Bonilla's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344871579.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.