Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: AW MANUFACTURING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AW MANUFACTURING, INC. in 249 SOUTH CARTER ST., OKOLONA, MS 38860 (NAICS 337121). OSHA activity number 344882337.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch AW Manufacturing, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AW Manufacturing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
249 SOUTH CARTER ST.
City
OKOLONA
State
MS
ZIP
38860
Mailing
111 SOUTH STREET, SHANNON, MS 38868
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337121
Employees
67
Ownership type
Private (A)

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,407 · Current $3,244 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:  (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020  the employer allowed the route to exit on south wall of the mill to be blocked by three totes of lumber exposing employees to burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3244.2
  • · Z (S) $5407

1910.37 B04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,482 · Current $5,089 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent:  (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020 the employer allowed employees to work in the shipping warehouse section of the facility and did not post signs indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit exposing employees to burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5089.2
  • · Z (S) $8482

1910.37 B05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet):   (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020 the employer allowed employees to work in the shipping warehouse section of the facility and did not post signs marking the only door on the north wall of the warehouse, which was locked, as not an exit exposing employees to burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.37 B06

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color:  (a) Plant site- On or about August 11, 2020 the employer did not illuminate exit sign on the front exit exposing employees to burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $10,603 · Current $6,362 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020 the employer failed to conduct a periodic inspection of energy control procedures exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6361.8
  • · Z (S) $10603

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 50 instances 40 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $10,603 · Current $6,362 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:  (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020 the employer failed to train affected employees on the purpose and use of energy control procedures exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6361.8
  • · Z (S) $10603

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $6,361 · Current $3,817 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:   (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020 the employer failed to train employees expected to fight incipient stage fires exposing employees to smoke inhalation and burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3816.6
  • · Z (S) $6361

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $10,603 · Current $6,362 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020 the employer allowed employees(s) to operate power industrial trucks who were not certified.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6361.8
  • · Z (S) $10603

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,482 · Current $5,089 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020 the employer failed to inspect powered industrial trucks daily prior to being placed in service exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5089.2
  • · Z (S) $8482

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $6,361 · Current $3,817 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020 the employer allowed employees to use chemical products in the workplace and did not implement a hazard communication program exposing employees to respiratory illness and burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3816.6
  • · Z (S) $6361

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer's written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present at the workplace:  (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020 the employer allowed employees to use chemical products in the workplace and did not provide a chemical inventory list exposing employees to respiratory illness and burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) Plant site - On or about August 11, 2020 the employer allowed employees to use chemical products in the workplace and did not train all employees as required exposing employees to respiratory illness and burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1904.7 B01 III

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,803 · Current $1,082 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(1)(iii): A work-related injury or illness which met the criteria of restricted work or transfer to another job was not recorded in the OSHA 300 log:  (a) Plant site - On or about the employer failed to record injuries in the workplace that occurred on June 18, 2020 and August 7, 2020 that resulting in work restrictions or job transfer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1081.8
  • · Z (O) $1803

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2020
Abate by
Dec 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  (a)  Plant Site - On or about August  11, 2020 the employer failed to conduct a workplace hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344882337.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.