UTICA, NY —
OSHA Inspection: UTICA ROOF PROS, LLC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of UTICA ROOF PROS, LLC. in 10 TABER LANE, UTICA, NY 13501 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344882865.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UTICA ROOF PROS, LLC.
- Site address
- 10 TABER LANE
- City
- UTICA
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13501
- Mailing
- 6405 WALKER ROAD, DEERFIELD, NY 13502
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,901 · Current $2,341 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a) 10 Taber Lane, south side of building, on or about 8-14-20: One employee was performing ground clean-up tasks, without head protection, while four employees worked on the roof above him.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2340.6
- — Z (S) $3901
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $5,461 · Current $3,277 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) 10 Taber Lane, south side of roof, on or about 8-14-20: Two employees were removing an existing roof (16:12 pitch), and were not protected from falls, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 16 feet 1 inch.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3276.6
- — Z (S) $5461
1926.503 A02 III
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2021
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii):The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other fall protection to be used: a) 10 Taber Lane, south side of roof, on or about 8-14-20: Four employees were working on a residential roof (16:12 pitch), without the training necessary for the employees to recognize the hazards associated with falls and their work. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $5,461 · Current $3,277 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: a) 10 Taber Lane, south side of roof, on or about 8-14-20: One employee was removing an existing roof (16:12 pitch) and was connected to a fall arrest system (safety rope) that was rigged with excess slack, such that the employee could fall more than 6 feet before the fall could be arrested.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3276.6
- — Z (S) $5461
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17):The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: a) 10 Taber Lane, south side of roof, on or about 8-14-20: Two employees were removing an existing roof (16:12 pitch) with their lanyard snap hooks connected to their leg straps in lieu of their dorsal D-rings, as required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Utica Roof Pros, LLC.
View Utica Roof Pros, LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344882865.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.