STAMFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: FENCES ETC., INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FENCES ETC., INC. in 69 SOUTHFIELD AVENUE, STAMFORD, CT 06902 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 344895743.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FENCES ETC., INC.
- Site address
- 69 SOUTHFIELD AVENUE
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06902
- Mailing
- 54 RESEARCH DRIVE, STAMFORD, CT 06906
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 12, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $2,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Jobsite: The employee working from the elevated platform to cut the west end of the rolling gate cross brace was not protected from falling approximately 17 feet to the ground by the use of a guardrail system, personnel fall arrest system or any other type of fall protection system. On or about August 24, 2020, the employee fell while performing the above task and sustained serious injuries requiring hospitalization.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,735 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees exposed to fall hazards while cutting the west end of the rolling gate cross brace were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $1735
1904.33 A
- Issued
- Nov 12, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $3,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.33(a): The employer did not maintain the OSHA 300 log, the privacy case list, the annual summary, and the OSHA 301 Incident Report forms for five (5) years following the end of the calendar year that these records cover. Establishment: The employer did not maintain the log of all Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300), the Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300-A), the privacy case list, and the Injury and Illness Incident Report (OSHA Form 301) for five (5) years following the end of the calendar year that these records cover.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $3500
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344895743.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.