OCEAN SPRINGS, MS ·
OSHA Inspection: PANCHO GUTIERRES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PANCHO GUTIERRES in 104 SPANISH COVE, OCEAN SPRINGS, MS 39564 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 344911185.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PANCHO GUTIERRES
- Site address
- 104 SPANISH COVE
- City
- OCEAN SPRINGS
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39564
- Mailing
- 513 31ST STREET, GULFPORT, MS 39501
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.304 D
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2020
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.304(d): Portable, power-driven circular saw(s) were not equipped with a guard above and below the base plate or shoe: (a) South side of house - On or about September 2, 2020 the employer failed to ensure the blade guard on the saw was not pinned up exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2020
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Top of framed first floor walls - On or about September 2, 2020 the employer failed to provide a fall protection system for employees working on top of the walls exposing them to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $4048
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 2, 2020
- Abate by
- Dec 3, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) Top of walls - On or about September 2, 2020 the employer failed to ensure that each employee exposed to fall hazards received training exposing them to falls in construction.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2892
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344911185.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.